Court No. :

281

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

The case was in a::

District Civil Court

Year of Case:

1998

Brief Comments

Will violate the Constitution to clear her docket and ease her workload in dereliction of her duties.

Court No. :

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

Year of Case:

2000

Remote Name:

216.201.151.227

Remote User:

Date:

August 14, 2002

Brief Comments

Judge Barbara Hale, Walker County Court at Law. Decided the case before it even began, and then assessed the maximum penalty allowed by law and then doubled it as punishment for having filed the appeal. Final cost of a speeding ticket, expired registration and expired inspection sticker in her court: $880.00.

Court No. :

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

The case was in a::

Federal District Court

Year of Case:

2002

Remote Name:

216.201.151.227

Remote User:

Date:

August 14, 2002

Brief Comments

Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr., United States District Judge, Southern District Court, Houston, Texas. Dismissed a Pro Se Petition for Emergency Injunctive Relief filed by the wife of a falsely-accused and wrongfully-imprisoned Defendant in a Criminal Action, to have him released from jail. In the Order, the Judge said only that it was DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, then ORDERED that a charge of Unauthorized Practice of Law be brought by this victimized wife just for trying to use the Law to bring her husband home!

T2:

insurance

T3:

insurance

The case was in a::

I rate this Judge as follows::

T4:

insurance

T1:

insurance

I was in the Court as::

Year of Case:

T5:

insurance

T6:

insurance

T7:

insurance

Date:

January 13, 2007

T2:

insurance

T3:

insurance

The case was in a::

I rate this Judge as follows::

T4:

insurance

T1:

insurance

I was in the Court as::

Year of Case:

T5:

insurance

T6:

insurance

T7:

insurance

Date:

January 12, 2007

T2:

Frank

T3:

Frank

The case was in a::

1

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

T4:

Frank

T1:

Frank

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

Frank

T5:

Frank

T6:

Frank

T7:

Frank

Date:

November 15, 2006

Brief Comments

Thank you! http://vpprxjjl.com/iulz/ulcv.html | http://ughjtijl.com/muob/pway.html

T2:

William

T3:

William

The case was in a::

1

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

T4:

William

T1:

William

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

William

T5:

William

T6:

William

T7:

William

Date:

November 15, 2006

Brief Comments

Good design! <a href="http://vpprxjjl.com/iulz/ulcv.html">My homepage</a> | <a href="http://mniawcqm.com/dywj/yims.html">Please visit</a>

T2:

Robert

T3:

Robert

The case was in a::

1

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

T4:

Robert

T1:

Robert

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

Robert

T5:

Robert

T6:

Robert

T7:

Robert

Date:

November 15, 2006

Brief Comments

Well done! [url=http://vpprxjjl.com/iulz/ulcv.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://qodrtine.com/lhwj/nlaq.html]Cool site[/url]

T2:

Tina

T3:

Tina

The case was in a::

1

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

T4:

Tina

T1:

Tina

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

Tina

T5:

Tina

T6:

Tina

T7:

Tina

Date:

November 13, 2006

Brief Comments

Nice site! http://abrgmdla.com/ldnl/xtag.html | http://yzjelkyi.com/reso/enmt.html

T2:

Ben

T3:

Ben

The case was in a::

1

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

T4:

Ben

T1:

Ben

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

Ben

T5:

Ben

T6:

Ben

T7:

Ben

Date:

November 13, 2006

Brief Comments

Nice site! <a href="http://abrgmdla.com/ldnl/xtag.html">My homepage</a> | <a href="http://dwqetehj.com/wsef/wjxg.html">Please visit</a>

T2:

Britney

T3:

Britney

The case was in a::

1

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

T4:

Britney

T1:

Britney

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

Britney

T5:

Britney

T6:

Britney

T7:

Britney

Date:

November 13, 2006

Brief Comments

Well done! [url=http://abrgmdla.com/ldnl/xtag.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://ggvvtkjm.com/ojha/gydd.html]Cool site[/url]

T2:

TX

T3:

Lamb

The case was in a::

District Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

154

T1:

Felix Klien

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

2006

T5:

T6:

T7:

nanamoma5806@yahoo.com

Date:

October 25, 2006

Brief Comments

we are grandparents that was awarded custody of 3yr old gs, judge should have given transfer to our county since gs has lived their for over 2 yrs, he denied. then after a visit with bio's gs was attacked by pit bull (& got dog back after quarantine) judge klien made him go back for next visit, then next court date cps testified bio's found to be neglectful and more harm could come to gs in home, judge ignored and sent gs back for standard visits, also yelled at my husband because we were being absurd for asking for supervised visits. cps also asked for drug test, our atty stated since the bio's had to take we would offer to take too, we took test, bio's were never made to test, the bio's have never pd child support judge finally told them between the 2 of them to pay $109 a month, judge didn't bother to look at their income or ask for any back child support. judge states this is all for best interest of grandson? how when he forced to go see parents that abandoned him when he was 9 mnths old and now decided they want him back, but do not wnat to support him and left him unsupervised with a pit bull.

T2:

TX

T3:

Lamb

The case was in a::

District Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

154

T1:

Felix Klien

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

2006

T5:

T6:

T7:

nanamoma5806@yahoo.com

Date:

October 25, 2006

Brief Comments

we are grandparents that was awarded custody of 3yr old gs, judge should have given transfer to our county since gs has lived their for over 2 yrs, he denied. then after a visit with bio's gs was attacked by pit bull (& got dog back after quarantine) judge klien made him go back for next visit, then next court date cps testified bio's found to be neglectful and more harm could come to gs in home, judge ignored and sent gs back for standard visits, also yelled at my husband because we were being absurd for asking for supervised visits. cps also asked for drug test, our atty stated since the bio's had to take we would offer to take too, we took test, bio's were never made to test, the bio's have never pd child support judge finally told them between the 2 of them to pay $109 a month, judge didn't bother to look at their income or ask for any back child support. judge states this is all for best interest of grandson? how when he forced to go see parents that abandoned him when he was 9 mnths old and now decided they want him back, but do not wnat to support him and left him unsupervised with a pit bull.

T2:

Patty

T3:

Patty

The case was in a::

1

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

T4:

Patty

T1:

Patty

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

Patty

T5:

Patty

T6:

Patty

T7:

Patty

Date:

September 28, 2006

Brief Comments

Thank you! http://eiusutwq.com/ezxp/xgix.html | http://swrwqtpg.com/osbj/uovc.html

T2:

Ben

T3:

Ben

The case was in a::

1

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

T4:

Ben

T1:

Ben

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

Ben

T5:

Ben

T6:

Ben

T7:

Ben

Date:

September 28, 2006

Brief Comments

Well done! <a href="http://eiusutwq.com/ezxp/xgix.html">My homepage</a> | <a href="http://ftgzancj.com/tdjk/sejy.html">Please visit</a>

T2:

Cassie

T3:

Cassie

The case was in a::

1

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

T4:

Cassie

T1:

Cassie

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

Cassie

T5:

Cassie

T6:

Cassie

T7:

Cassie

Date:

September 28, 2006

Brief Comments

Well done! [url=http://eiusutwq.com/ezxp/xgix.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://qxswmbus.com/ipuq/dkxv.html]Cool site[/url]

T2:

Kentucky

T3:

Jefferson

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

Circuit 30, Div 6

T1:

Jerry J. Bowles

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

2005

T5:

T6:

2 weeks

T7:

donsin@bellsouth.net

Date:

September 27, 2006

Brief Comments

I myself have had a problem with Judge Jerry Bowles. In a domestic violence hearing where I was the Respondant, I stated the fact that the Petitioner and I never lived together and don't qualify as a unmarried couple. I mentioned a witness twice and the judge did not acknowledge it. My witness was the Petitoners own mother to make testimony that I never lived with the Petitioner, and that the Petitioner has been persuing me for years to be in a relationship. The Petitioner has admitted to her mother that I did not do the things that I am accused of. The judge did not even ask the Petitioner to show any kind of evidence of her and I ever living together. Here in Kentucky, it is required that a couple be living together or formally living together or have a common child together to qualify to file domestic violence. I even tried to show evidence of this women calling my cell phone 112 times during the two months after the aledged incedent. Of course I deny the accusations. To top it all, the judge allowed her to make a whole bunch of other complaints that were not in the original written petition and didn't give me a chance to make my legal response. I feel I was denied a fair trial.

T2:

Kentucky

T3:

Jefferson

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

Circuit 30, Div 6

T1:

Jerry J. Bowles

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

2005

T5:

T6:

2 weeks

T7:

donsin@bellsouth.net

Date:

September 27, 2006

Brief Comments

I myself have had a problem with Judge Jerry Bowles. In a domestic violence hearing where I was the Respondant, I stated the fact that the Petitioner and I never lived together and don't qualify as a unmarried couple. I mentioned a witness twice and the judge did not acknowledge it. My witness was the Petitoners own mother to make testimony that I never lived with the Petitioner, and that the Petitioner has been persuing me for years to be in a relationship. The Petitioner has admitted to her mother that I did not do the things that I am accused of. The judge did not even ask the Petitioner to show any kind of evidence of her and I ever living together. Here in Kentucky, it is required that a couple be living together or formally living together or have a common child together to qualify to file domestic violence. I even tried to show evidence of this women calling my cell phone 112 times during the two months after the aledged incedent. Of course I deny the accusations. To top it all, the judge allowed her to make a whole bunch of other complaints that were not in the original written petition and didn't give me a chance to make my legal response. I feel I was denied a fair trial.

T2:

Kentucky

T3:

Jefferson

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

Circuit 30, Div 6

T1:

Jerry J. Bowles

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

2005

T5:

T6:

2 weeks

T7:

donsin@bellsouth.net

Date:

September 27, 2006

Brief Comments

I myself have had a problem with Judge Jerry Bowles. In a domestic violence hearing where I was the Respondant, I stated the fact that the Petitioner and I never lived together and don't qualify as a unmarried couple. I mentioned a witness twice and the judge did not acknowledge it. My witness was the Petitoners own mother to make testimony that I never lived with the Petitioner, and that the Petitioner has been persuing me for years to be in a relationship. The Petitioner has admitted to her mother that I did not do the things that I am accused of. The judge did not even ask the Petitioner to show any kind of evidence of her and I ever living together. Here in Kentucky, it is required that a couple be living together or formally living together or have a common child together to qualify to file domestic violence. I even tried to show evidence of this women calling my cell phone 112 times during the two months after the aledged incedent. Of course I deny the accusations. To top it all, the judge allowed her to make a whole bunch of other complaints that were not in the original written petition and didn't give me a chance to make my legal response. I feel I was denied a fair trial.

T2:

Kentucky

T3:

Jefferson

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

Circuit 30, Div 6

T1:

Jerry J. Bowles

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

2005

T5:

T6:

2 weeks

T7:

donsin@bellsouth.net

Date:

September 27, 2006

Brief Comments

I myself have had a problem with Judge Jerry Bowles. In a domestic violence hearing where I was the Respondant, I stated the fact that the Petitioner and I never lived together and don't qualify as a unmarried couple. I mentioned a witness twice and the judge did not acknowledge it. My witness was the Petitoners own mother to make testimony that I never lived with the Petitioner, and that the Petitioner has been persuing me for years to be in a relationship. The Petitioner has admitted to her mother that I did not do the things that I am accused of. The judge did not even ask the Petitioner to show any kind of evidence of her and I ever living together. Here in Kentucky, it is required that a couple be living together or formally living together or have a common child together to qualify to file domestic violence. I even tried to show evidence of this women calling my cell phone 112 times during the two months after the aledged incedent. Of course I deny the accusations. To top it all, the judge allowed her to make a whole bunch of other complaints that were not in the original written petition and didn't give me a chance to make my legal response. I feel I was denied a fair trial.

T2:

North Carolina

T3:

Currituck

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

1

T1:

Cole

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

2006

T5:

T6:

1

T7:

rhondakirschmann@yahoo.com

Date:

September 05, 2006

Brief Comments

Judge Cole ruled in open District court that I do not have the right to the use and enjoyment of my own property and that I can not put a fence on my own property.

He ruled in open District court that I can and will be repeatedly arrested for raking my own yard.

There is more information about this case at http://www.xanga.com/arrestedforrakingmyyard

T2:

North Carolina

T3:

Currituck

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

1

T1:

Cole

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

2006

T5:

T6:

1

T7:

rhondakirschmann@yahoo.com

Date:

September 05, 2006

Brief Comments

Judge Cole ruled in open District court that I do not have the right to the use and enjoyment of my own property and that I can not put a fence on my own property.

He ruled in open District court that I can and will be repeatedly arrested for raking my own yard.

There is more information about this case at http://www.xanga.com/arrestedforrakingmyyard

T2:

Texas

T3:

Collin

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

380TH

T1:

Charles Sandoval

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

2005

T5:

1

T6:

4

T7:

johndoe@email.com

Date:

April 06, 2006

Brief Comments

Judge Sandoval based a custody decision on bias, and his own personal feelings. The husband in the case was warned that the Judge had just lost his wife and had several children at home and was "pro-woman" and that it was going to be a very hard case to win. The husband had put up with years of emotional instability from his wife, who was medicated for her issues by her doctor, but never took her meds properly. She also treated his son from a previous marriage terribly after she found out that she was pregnant with their son, and continued to do so throughout their marriage. The husband asked for a divorce near the end of April 2004 and the wife filed first, and wanting to get even, cited adultery in her initial petition for divorce. Judge Sandoval would not even hear the husband's side in court. He allowed the wife to speak, and sob and claim that he cheated on her while she was out of town one weekend. The mother was handed custody of their six year old son and awarded over $430 a month in child support. Today, nearly one year later (the case did not close officially until August of 2005), their son is having trouble in school. He is hyperactive, and has behavior issues becuase there is no discipline in his mother's home. She allows him to run amuck and do as he pleases as long as he does not bother her. She dresses him in old clothing that is either too small or is stained or torn, does not feed him properly, and allows him to ride in the front seat of her vehicle, with no booster seat, and allows him to wear the lap portion of the belt only. Even though this mother has a two bedroom apartment, she also allows her son to sleep with her, in her room and in her bed at night. Seeing all that has happened with this child and all that is continuing to happen, makes one very untrusting of the legal system. To know that a judge can get away with 1)not allowing a person to tell their side of the story in court and 2)basing his decision on his own personal feelings and bias is ridiculous and scary. Now this father and the son's extended family can only watch as the child suffers at the hands of his mother. The father cannot even ask for a court date to review custody until August 2006 and has been told that even then, unless he can prove that the child has been abused or mistreated in some way, that the courts will not likely reverse the custody decision.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Collin

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

380TH

T1:

Charles Sandoval

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

2005

T5:

1

T6:

4

T7:

johndoe@email.com

Date:

April 06, 2006

Brief Comments

Judge Sandoval based a custody decision on bias, and his own personal feelings. The husband in the case was warned that the Judge had just lost his wife and had several children at home and was "pro-woman" and that it was going to be a very hard case to win. The husband had put up with years of emotional instability from his wife, who was medicated for her issues by her doctor, but never took her meds properly. She also treated his son from a previous marriage terribly after she found out that she was pregnant with their son, and continued to do so throughout their marriage. The husband asked for a divorce near the end of April 2004 and the wife filed first, and wanting to get even, cited adultery in her initial petition for divorce. Judge Sandoval would not even hear the husband's side in court. He allowed the wife to speak, and sob and claim that he cheated on her while she was out of town one weekend. The mother was handed custody of their six year old son and awarded over $430 a month in child support. Today, nearly one year later (the case did not close officially until August of 2005), their son is having trouble in school. He is hyperactive, and has behavior issues becuase there is no discipline in his mother's home. She allows him to run amuck and do as he pleases as long as he does not bother her. She dresses him in old clothing that is either too small or is stained or torn, does not feed him properly, and allows him to ride in the front seat of her vehicle, with no booster seat, and allows him to wear the lap portion of the belt only. Even though this mother has a two bedroom apartment, she also allows her son to sleep with her, in her room and in her bed at night. Seeing all that has happened with this child and all that is continuing to happen, makes one very untrusting of the legal system. To know that a judge can get away with 1)not allowing a person to tell their side of the story in court and 2)basing his decision on his own personal feelings and bias is ridiculous and scary. Now this father and the son's extended family can only watch as the child suffers at the hands of his mother. The father cannot even ask for a court date to review custody until August 2006 and has been told that even then, unless he can prove that the child has been abused or mistreated in some way, that the courts will not likely reverse the custody decision.

T2:

T3:

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

T4:

T1:

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

1974

T5:

T6:

T7:

Date:

January 02, 2006

Brief Comments

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

185

T1:

Susan Brown

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

Year of Case:

2005

T5:

T6:

1

T7:

kmobannon@yahoo.com

Date:

October 12, 2005

Brief Comments

I understand if you are on probation and you violate that probation you SHOULD be punished. I would not go as far as to send a person to jail for months for drinking 2 beers. I agree punishment should be made. And yes a hard lesson was learned. You don't always have to look at a piece of paper to make your point. As she stated in HER court room "I am ready to send someone to jail, thats just the type of mood I'm in today." I'm sorry Ms. Brown you aren't paid to sit there with your bad mood. Texas tax dollars don't pay you to send people to jail because you feel like it. We pay you to be fair and as stated many of times a person is innocent until proven guilty. OHH NO not in susan brown's court room. You are GULITY until proven INNOCENT.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

185

T1:

Susan Brown

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

Year of Case:

2005

T5:

T6:

1

T7:

Date:

October 12, 2005

Brief Comments

I understand if you are on probation and you violate that probation you SHOULD be punished. I would not go as far as to send a person to jail for months for drinking 2 beers. I agree punishment should be made. And yes a hard lesson was learned. You don't always have to look at a piece of paper to make your point. As she stated in HER court room "I am ready to send someone to jail, thats just the type of mood I'm in today." I'm sorry Ms. Brown you aren't paid to sit there with your bad mood. Texas tax dollars don't pay you to send people to jail because you feel like it. We pay you to be fair and as stated many of times a person is innocent until proven guilty. OHH NO not in susan brown's court room. You are GULITY until proven INNOCENT.

T2:

alabama

T3:

calhoun

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

?

T1:

laura b. phillips

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

1

T6:

7

T7:

maddmaxxsmom@yahoo.com

Date:

October 07, 2005

Brief Comments

judge laura b phillips is biased,dispenses injustice rather than justice,is not fair and impartial,she is prosecutting men from the bench,she was know as 90% for the women in her first 90 days as a judge,she violates due process rights.she signed the hearing order for alimony modification on jan 10,05 setting it for jan 18,05 lawyer mailed it to my husband on friday jan14,05 monday was a holiday we received it tuesday the 18 of jan, 2 hours after it was over.we live in oregon and this hearing was in alabama,she then threatened that if my husband ever set foot in alabama and attempted another modification she would jail him indefinatly.she then ordered $1400. out of his $1500. take home pay to his ex wife.my husband is a us veteran who was crippled 2 mnths before his divorce in 01 and stripped of 100% of assets, given 100% of debt with lg. alimony and child support pymts.ex knew he had no income,admitted to it in front of laura phillips.this judge needs to be removed from the bench.we all have the right to fair and impartial judges.laura b phillips is not one.

T2:

alabama

T3:

calhoun

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

?

T1:

laura b. phillips

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

1

T6:

7

T7:

maddmaxxsmom@yahoo.com

Date:

October 07, 2005

Brief Comments

judge laura b phillips is biased,dispenses injustice rather than justice,is not fair and impartial,she is prosecutting men from the bench,she was know as 90% for the women in her first 90 days as a judge,she violates due process rights.she signed the hearing order for alimony modification on jan 10,05 setting it for jan 18,05 lawyer mailed it to my husband on friday jan14,05 monday was a holiday we received it tuesday the 18 of jan, 2 hours after it was over.we live in oregon and this hearing was in alabama,she then threatened that if my husband ever set foot in alabama and attempted another modification she would jail him indefinatly.she then ordered $1400. out of his $1500. take home pay to his ex wife.my husband is a us veteran who was crippled 2 mnths before his divorce in 01 and stripped of 100% of assets, given 100% of debt with lg. alimony and child support pymts.ex knew he had no income,admitted to it in front of laura phillips.this judge needs to be removed from the bench.we all have the right to fair and impartial judges.laura b phillips is not one.

T2:

alabama

T3:

calhoun

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

?

T1:

laura b. phillips

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

1

T6:

7

T7:

maddmaxxsmom@yahoo.com

Date:

October 07, 2005

Brief Comments

judge laura b phillips is biased,dispenses injustice rather than justice,is not fair and impartial,she is prosecutting men from the bench,she was know as 90% for the women in her first 90 days as a judge,she violates due process rights.she signed the hearing order for alimony modification on jan 10,05 setting it for jan 18,05 lawyer mailed it to my husband on friday jan14,05 monday was a holiday we received it tuesday the 18 of jan, 2 hours after it was over.we live in oregon and this hearing was in alabama,she then threatened that if my husband ever set foot in alabama and attempted another modification she would jail him indefinatly.she then ordered $1400. out of his $1500. take home pay to his ex wife.my husband is a us veteran who was crippled 2 mnths before his divorce in 01 and stripped of 100% of assets, given 100% of debt with lg. alimony and child support pymts.ex knew he had no income,admitted to it in front of laura phillips.this judge needs to be removed from the bench.we all have the right to fair and impartial judges.laura b phillips is not one.

T2:

alabama

T3:

calhoun

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

?

T1:

laura b. phillips

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

1

T6:

7

T7:

maddmaxxsmom@yahoo.com

Date:

October 07, 2005

Brief Comments

judge laura b phillips is biased,dispenses injustice rather than justice,is not fair and impartial,she is prosecutting men from the bench,she was know as 90% for the women in her first 90 days as a judge,she violates due process rights.she signed the hearing order for alimony modification on jan 10,05 setting it for jan 18,05 lawyer mailed it to my husband on friday jan14,05 monday was a holiday we received it tuesday the 18 of jan, 2 hours after it was over.we live in oregon and this hearing was in alabama,she then threatened that if my husband ever set foot in alabama and attempted another modification she would jail him indefinatly.she then ordered $1400. out of his $1500. take home pay to his ex wife.my husband is a us veteran who was crippled 2 mnths before his divorce in 01 and stripped of 100% of assets, given 100% of debt with lg. alimony and child support pymts.ex knew he had no income,admitted to it in front of laura phillips.this judge needs to be removed from the bench.we all have the right to fair and impartial judges.laura b phillips is not one.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

230

T1:

Belinda Hill

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

2005

T5:

T6:

3

T7:

sir-reed@swbell.net

Date:

October 06, 2005

Brief Comments

The Honorable Belinda Hill(which is an oxymoron) is not who she thinks or says she is. This is her quote from the Houston Lawyer Nov/Dec 2002, "Professionalism, encompasses honesty, integrity, and fair dealing in all aspects of our practice and our service. It is a personal characteristic that every attorney and judge should demonstrate." It is so sad that this judge does not understand the definition of fair dealings. To revoke a bond and then impose a "no-bond" for a first time offender without hearing any facts is not called fair dealings anyway you look at it. Due to this extreme punishment the result will be loss of full time college courses and a good job that allows this young person to go to school and make good money to afford college. Where is the justice in this? A higher bond would impose enough hardships on this college student to make your point that the "God Of Law" rules in Belinda HIll's court and dont you forget it. Due to this abhorant and unjust action taken by HIll on a first offender, It is hard for me to teach my son how wonderful our justice system is when I have lost any confidence is this system be just or fair. It is only that way if you can afford the high dollar lawyers, then your case gets dismissed. If I had not seen this judges actions toward my son that he is guilty until proven innocent I would not have believed it. I will never ever believe that there is justice in Harris County after seeing the Honorable Belinda HIll in her un just actions. I proay for every person who has to enter into this court of intimidation and unjusticeness.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

230

T1:

Belinda Hill

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

2005

T5:

T6:

3

T7:

sir-reed@swbell.net

Date:

October 06, 2005

Brief Comments

The Honorable Belinda Hill(which is an oxymoron) is not who she thinks or says she is. This is her quote from the Houston Lawyer Nov/Dec 2002, "Professionalism, encompasses honesty, integrity, and fair dealing in all aspects of our practice and our service. It is a personal characteristic that every attorney and judge should demonstrate." It is so sad that this judge does not understand the definition of fair dealings. To revoke a bond and then impose a "no-bond" for a first time offender without hearing any facts is not called fair dealings anyway you look at it. Due to this extreme punishment the result will be loss of full time college courses and a good job that allows this young person to go to school and make good money to afford college. Where is the justice in this? A higher bond would impose enough hardships on this college student to make your point that the "God Of Law" rules in Belinda HIll's court and dont you forget it. Due to this abhorant and unjust action taken by HIll on a first offender, It is hard for me to teach my son how wonderful our justice system is when I have lost any confidence is this system be just or fair. It is only that way if you can afford the high dollar lawyers, then your case gets dismissed. If I had not seen this judges actions toward my son that he is guilty until proven innocent I would not have believed it. I will never ever believe that there is justice in Harris County after seeing the Honorable Belinda HIll in her un just actions. I proay for every person who has to enter into this court of intimidation and unjusticeness.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

247

T1:

Bonnie Hellums

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

Year of Case:

2005

T5:

T6:

30=

T7:

Crystlgib@yahoo.com

Date:

September 29, 2005

Brief Comments

This is a second entry against this judge. The latest is she has violated current Texas Family Court Law. She threw out another judge's protective order and awarded the father custody of my children.

T2:

texas

T3:

harris

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

178

T1:

Belinda Hill

I was in the Court as::

Attorney for the Defendant

Year of Case:

178

T5:

0

T6:

6

T7:

thomaspib@hotmail.com

Date:

September 29, 2005

Brief Comments

Mrs. Hill uses the courts as her own personal vendetta against men and impailes justice by striking fear in the very attorneys that appear before her thereby sufficating the judicial process.

T2:

texas

T3:

harris

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

178

T1:

Belinda Hill

I was in the Court as::

Attorney for the Defendant

Year of Case:

178

T5:

T6:

6

T7:

thomaspib@hotmail.com

Date:

September 29, 2005

Brief Comments

Mrs. Hill uses the courts as her own personal vendetta against men and impailes justice by striking fear in the very attorneys that appear before her thereby sufficating the judicial process.

T2:

texas

T3:

harris

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

178

T1:

Belinda Hill

I was in the Court as::

Attorney for the Defendant

Year of Case:

178

T5:

T6:

6

T7:

thomaspib@hotmail.com

Date:

September 29, 2005

Brief Comments

Mrs. Hill uses the courts as her own personal vendetta against men and impailes justice by striking fear in the very attorneys that appear before her thereby sufficating the judicial process.

T2:

TEXAS

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

1st CCA

T1:

Who Knows

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

Year of Case:

2003

T5:

T6:

T7:

info@informed.org

Date:

August 30, 2005

Brief Comments

The CCA of Texas 1st and 14th repesent Harris County and guess what? Both courts are located in Harris County. August 17, 2005 over 113 Writs were denied because the trial judges would not agree to an appeal. This is unfair and the Supreme Court needs to look at what is going on in Texas judicial system. There is nothing fair or just about rubber stamping over 113 Writs for appeals in the same day. Look at the Judges on these courts, some of them are up for re-election and should be removed from the bench.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

185th

T1:

?

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

T6:

6

T7:

info@informed.org

Date:

July 27, 2005

Brief Comments

This Judge should be removed from the bench. This judge is biased and unfair on refuses to listen to the defense attorney and to look at any information presented. This judge only listens to the DA's office and has already reached a verdict before the trial has begun. At no time have I ever witnessed this judge as being fair, just mean.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

185th

T1:

?

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

T6:

6

T7:

bj@yahoo.com

Date:

July 27, 2005

Brief Comments

This Judge should be removed from the bench. This judge is biased and unfair on refuses to listen to the defense attorney and to look at any information presented. This judge only listens to the DA's office and has already reached a verdict before the trial has begun. At no time have I ever witnessed this judge as being fair, just mean.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

V8

T4:

185th

T1:

Susan B. Brown

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

T6:

06

T7:

vanloh58@yahoo.com

Date:

July 09, 2005

Brief Comments

According to the Rule for Judges a Judge is required to be non biased. After watching Judge Brown in action, she missed the ball somewhere when this was taught. Judge Brown only listened to the ADA and refused to review any evidence submitted by a defense attorney in the pre-trial hearings. When the case was documented for trial, she had gone on to bigger and better things a murder trial. She does not know but the defendant in the murder trial heard the person's name whose case she elected to withdraw from and go on to bigger and better things to further her own career, while the jury was in the room as well as the defense attorneys talking about the trial that had just completed on the Friday before. The defendant in the murder trial told the defendant of the case she elected to turn over to two visiting Jusges he heard his name given out loud and the ADA state he could not believe he got such a light sentence. Well, this young man never got to tell his story which was entirely different than the main prosecutors witness and the witnesses who could have proven his story were never allowed to get on the stand and testify. Something is very wrong with the "Judicial System"? in Harris County, Texas and one day what goes around will come around. God does not tolerate sin for very long. JUdge Brown not only was biased, but she made Rulings Contray to Law and Contray to the Constitution.

T2:

T3:

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

T4:

T1:

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

T5:

T6:

T7:

Date:

July 09, 2005

Brief Comments

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

185

T1:

Susan V. Brown

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

T6:

6

T7:

vanloh58@yahoo.com

Date:

June 27, 2005

Brief Comments

This Judge is biased and confers with the DA's office and it is apparent this Judge has already formed an opinion before the trial starts.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

V8

T4:

185

T1:

Susan V. Brown

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

T6:

6

T7:

vanloh58@yahoo.com

Date:

June 27, 2005

Brief Comments

This Judge is biased and confers with the DA's office and it is apparent this Judge has already formed an opinion before the trial starts.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

185

T1:

Susan Brown

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

2003

T5:

1 yr

T6:

T7:

vanloh58@yahoo.com

Date:

June 09, 2005

Brief Comments

I was in 185th District Court in August 2003 to witness a pre-trail hearing. The Judge, Susan Brown was rude, biased and very unfair to both the defendant and his family. She will listen to only one side of a case and has made up her mind before the facts are submitted based upon what the ADA has told her. I will not vote for her ever again. I am a pre-law student and I could not believe the biased phrases and lack of repect this judge used in this court. She does not follow the rules of the Constitution and everyone is guilty before any trial is ever presented. She listens to only what the ADA tells her and is totally disrespectful to others. She should be removed from her bench!!

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

185

T1:

Susan Brown

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

2003

T5:

1 yr

T6:

T7:

info@informed.org

Date:

June 09, 2005

Brief Comments

I was in 185th District Court in August 2003 to witness a pre-trail hearing. The Judge, Susan Brown was rude, biased and very unfair to both the defendant and his family. She will listen to only one side of a case and has made up her mind before the facts are submitted based upon what the ADA has told her. I will not vote for her ever again. I am a pre-law student and I could not believe the biased phrases and lack of repect this judge used in this court. She does not follow the rules of the Constitution and everyone is guilty before any trial is ever presented. She listens to only what the ADA tells her and is totally disrespectful to others. She should be removed from her bench!!

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

185

T1:

Susan Bown

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

T5:

2

T6:

T7:

vanlon58@yahoo.com

Date:

June 09, 2005

Brief Comments

I am a law student was observing pre-trial cases. Judge Susan Brown is rude, uncaring and biased toward all who appear before her. She made rulings contrary to Law and contrary to the Constituiton against a young man who had never been in trouble before. She only listens to the DA's office and totally ignores the rights of person who appear before her. She should be removed from office and I for one will vote against her in the next election. The rules for judges should be followed by every judge who takes an oath to do so.

T2:

T3:

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

T4:

T1:

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

T5:

T6:

T7:

Date:

May 06, 2005

Brief Comments

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

V8

T4:

247

T1:

Bonnie Hellums

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

2003

T5:

2

T6:

4

T7:

crystlgib@yahoo.com

Date:

February 24, 2005

Brief Comments

Judge Hellums has made serveral ruling that are contrary to law.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

District Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

247

T1:

Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

1

T6:

10

T7:

crystlgib@yahoo.com

Date:

December 20, 2004

Brief Comments

In my experience, Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums never reviews her case files, shows gross bias, has meetings with only one side of council, and issues illegal orders. Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums, ordered me to present another adult for a deposition and to serve that adult with the notice. I am party to the suit and can not be required to present another competent party. When I was unable to comply with the order Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums ordered I pay over $1000 in court cost and attorney fees. On the next hearing she grossly displayed bias stating that she, in the event the opposing council makes allegations without proof, she would take their word over mine. The opposing council submitted a sworn affidavit making herself a material witness in the case, but was not removed as council. Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums then signed a writ of attachment removing my children from my custody based solely on the opposing council’s hearsay testimony.

T2:

Pennsylvania

T3:

Philadelphia

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

1002

T1:

Poserina

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

Year of Case:

1999

T5:

T6:

T7:

koedayj@yahoo.com

Date:

November 27, 2004

Brief Comments

While observing a case which consisted of a robbery with a firearm,I couldn't help but notice that-- (1)the person that was accused had no past or present criminal history (2)was not from this country(3)has 2 children which are American citizens(4)looked absolutely lost in translation. Then I noticed something else, the person that accused this young man---(1)did not show for court the first day of trial(2)mentioned he was almost robbed-ALMOST--(3)changed the color of the weapon(4)changed the area to which he was ALMOST robbed(5)never mentioned anything to police upon initial occurance that the perpetrator has an accent,also it was never mentioned ia the preliminary proceding. That same young man the accused was found guilty by the jury and he was sentenced 5-10 years for this case. This young man was convicted for this crime----unbelievable!!!!!And now he's at an Immigration prison,which he may get deported for this nonsence crime. He was convicted on Feb.3,2000 and is serving more time--This same young man has appealed this and was turned down by Judge Poserina --DENIED HIS FREEDOM,on Nov.18,2004,and is now waiting for the outcome of his day in front of the Immigration judge.What will become of those children and his fiance who left the Criminal Justice Center distraught,confused,and dumbfounded.Where is the justice for that poor family.

T2:

Pennsylvania

T3:

Philadelphia

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

1002

T1:

Poserina

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

Year of Case:

1999

T5:

T6:

T7:

koedayj@yahoo.com

Date:

November 27, 2004

Brief Comments

While observing a case which consisted of a robbery with a firearm,I couldn't help but notice that-- (1)the person that was accused had no past or present criminal history (2)was not from this country(3)has 2 children which are American citizens(4)looked absolutely lost in translation. Then I noticed something else, the person that accused this young man---(1)did not show for court the first day of trial(2)mentioned he was almost robbed-ALMOST--(3)changed the color of the weapon(4)changed the area to which he was ALMOST robbed(5)never mentioned anything to police upon initial occurance that the perpetrator has an accent,also it was never mentioned ia the preliminary proceding. That same young man the accused was found guilty by the jury and he was sentenced 5-10 years for this case. This young man was convicted for this crime----unbelievable!!!!!And now he's at an Immigration prison,which he may get deported for this nonsence crime. He was convicted on Feb.3,2000 and is serving more time--This same young man has appealed this and was turned down by Judge Poserina --DENIED HIS FREEDOM,on Nov.18,2004,and is now waiting for the outcome of his day in front of the Immigration judge.What will become of those children and his fiance who left the Criminal Justice Center distraught,confused,and dumbfounded.Where is the justice for that poor family.

T2:

Pennsylvania

T3:

Philadelphia

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

1002

T1:

Poserina

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

Year of Case:

1999

T5:

T6:

T7:

koedayj@yahoo.com

Date:

November 27, 2004

Brief Comments

While observing a case which consisted of a robbery with a firearm,I couldn't help but notice that-- (1)the person that was accused had no past or present criminal history (2)was not from this country(3)has 2 children which are American citizens(4)looked absolutely lost in translation. Then I noticed something else, the person that accused this young man---(1)did not show for court the first day of trial(2)mentioned he was almost robbed-ALMOST--(3)changed the color of the weapon(4)changed the area to which he was ALMOST robbed(5)never mentioned anything to police upon initial occurance that the perpetrator has an accent,also it was never mentioned ia the preliminary proceding. That same young man the accused was found guilty by the jury and he was sentenced 5-10 years for this case. This young man was convicted for this crime----unbelievable!!!!!And now he's at an Immigration prison,which he may get deported for this nonsence crime. He was convicted on Feb.3,2000 and is serving more time--This same young man has appealed this and was turned down by Judge Poserina --DENIED HIS FREEDOM,on Nov.18,2004,and is now waiting for the outcome of his day in front of the Immigration judge.What will become of those children and his fiance who left the Criminal Justice Center distraught,confused,and dumbfounded.Where is the justice for that poor family.

T2:

Pennsylvania

T3:

Philadelphia

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

1002

T1:

Poserina

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

1999

T5:

T6:

T7:

koedayj@yahoo.com

Date:

November 27, 2004

Brief Comments

While observing a case which consisted of a robbery with a firearm,I couldn't help but notice that-- (1)the person that was accused had no past or present criminal history (2)was not from this country(3)has 2 children which are American citizens(4)looked absolutely lost in translation. Then I noticed something else, the person that accused this young man---(1)did not show for court the first day of trial(2)mentioned he was almost robbed-ALMOST--(3)changed the color of the weapon(4)changed the area to which he was ALMOST robbed(5)never mentioned anything to police upon initial occurance that the perpetrator has an accent,also it was never mentioned ia the preliminary proceding. That same young man the accused was found guilty by the jury and he was sentenced 5-10 years for this case. This young man was convicted for this crime----unbelievable!!!!!And now he's at an Immigration prison,which he may get deported for this nonsence crime. He was convicted on Feb.3,2000 and is serving more time--This same young man has appealed this and was turned down by Judge Poserina --DENIED HIS FREEDOM,on Nov.18,2004,and is now waiting for the outcome of his day in front of the Immigration judge.What will become of those children and his fiance who left the Criminal Justice Center distraught,confused,and dumbfounded.Where is the justice for that poor family.

T2:

Pennsylvania

T3:

Philadelphia

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

1002

T1:

Poserina

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

1999

T5:

T6:

T7:

Date:

November 27, 2004

Brief Comments

While observing a case which consisted of a robbery with a firearm,I couldn't help but notice that-- (1)the person that was accused had no past or present criminal history (2)was not from this country(3)has 2 children which are American citizens(4)looked absolutely lost in translation. Then I noticed something else, the person that accused this young man---(1)did not show for court the first day of trial(2)mentioned he was almost robbed-ALMOST--(3)changed the color of the weapon(4)changed the area to which he was ALMOST robbed(5)never mentioned anything to police upon initial occurance that the perpetrator has an accent,also it was never mentioned ia the preliminary proceding. That same young man the accused was found guilty by the jury and he was sentenced 5-10 years for this case. This young man was convicted for this crime----unbelievable!!!!!And now he's at an Immigration prison,which he may get deported for this nonsence crime. He was convicted on Feb.3,2000 and is serving more time--This same young man has appealed this and was turned down by Judge Poserina --DENIED HIS FREEDOM,on Nov.18,2004,and is now waiting for the outcome of his day in front of the Immigration judge.What will become of those children and his fiance who left the Criminal Justice Center distraught,confused,and dumbfounded.Where is the justice for that poor family.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

185

T1:

Judge Susan Valentine Brown

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

Year of Case:

2003

T5:

1

T6:

4

T7:

bpeterson1@sw.rr.com

Date:

November 22, 2004

Brief Comments

An accident that happened in another courtry was allowed in court by this judge and should not have been.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

V8

T4:

185th

T1:

Judge Susan Valentine Brown

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

August 2003

T6:

T7:

bpeterson@sw.rr.com

Date:

November 21, 2004

Brief Comments

Something or someone needs to look into the unfair sentences and convictin handed out for first offenses and the need for help and not just punish. We have been victimized by this court and the Harris County District Attorney's office and the Judge who presided.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

185

T1:

Judge Susan Valentine Brown

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

1

T6:

T7:

bpeterson@sw.rr.com

Date:

November 21, 2004

Brief Comments

Something or someone needs to look into the unfair sentences and convictin handed out for first offenses and the need for help and not just punish. We have been victimized by this court and the Harris County District Attorney's office and the Judge who presided.

T2:

texas

T3:

burnet

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

33rd judicial district

T1:

clayton evans

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

1996

T5:

T6:

10

T7:

fishintxs@hotmail.com

Date:

November 21, 2004

Brief Comments

I was taken to a small room in the courthouse and told thast if I did not sign a plea bargain that I would be sent to prison in the morning on a 99 year sentence.I was not represented by an atty. although,trey brown,from the public defenders office was present and had previously told me that he could not represent me because I had filed a grievance with the state bar of texas against him.He boldly stated that now he would get even. I felt that I had to sign a plea bargain, and I put u. d. {under duress} after my signature. It all started because I was forced to file a lawsuit against ross glennon lavin- Burnet county atty. for corruption of his office. and he actually had 15 grand jury indictments pending against him. Then they handed the whole thing over to the state bar of texas, who inturn let him walk free.

T2:

texas

T3:

burnet

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

33rd judicial district

T1:

clayton evans

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

1996

T5:

T6:

10

T7:

fishintxs@hotmail.com

Date:

November 21, 2004

Brief Comments

I was taken to a small room in the courthouse and told thast if I did not sign a plea bargain that I would be sent to prison in the morning on a 99 year sentence.I was not represented by an atty. although,trey brown,from the public defenders office was present and had previously told me that he could not represent me because I had filed a grievance with the state bar of texas against him.He boldly stated that now he would get even. I felt that I had to sign a plea bargain, and I put u. d. {under duress} after my signature. It all started because I was forced to file a lawsuit against ross glennon lavin- Burnet county atty. for corruption of his office. and he actually had 15 grand jury indictments pending against him. Then they handed the whole thing over to the state bar of texas, who inturn let him walk free.

T2:

texas

T3:

burnet

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

33rd judicial district

T1:

clayton evans

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

1996

T5:

T6:

10

T7:

Date:

November 21, 2004

Brief Comments

I was taken to a small room in the courthouse and told thast if I did not sign a plea bargain that I would be sent to prison in the morning on a 99 year sentence.I was not represented by an atty. although,trey brown,from the public defenders office was present and had previously told me that he could not represent me because I had filed a grievance with the state bar of texas against him.He boldly stated that now he would get even. I felt that I had to sign a plea bargain, and I put u. d. {under duress} after my signature. It all started because I was forced to file a lawsuit against ross glennon lavin- Burnet county atty. for corruption of his office. and he actually had 15 grand jury indictments pending against him. Then they handed the whole thing over to the state bar of texas, who inturn let him walk free.

T2:

texas

T3:

burnet

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

33rd judicial district

T1:

clayton evans

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

1996

T5:

T6:

10

T7:

dgoble@ktc.com

Date:

November 21, 2004

Brief Comments

I was taken to a small room in the courthouse and told thast if I did not sign a plea bargain that I would be sent to prison in the morning on a 99 year sentence.I was not represented by an atty. although,trey brown,from the public defenders office was present and had previously told me that he could not represent me because I had filed a grievance with the state bar of texas against him.He boldly stated that now he would get even. I felt that I had to sign a plea bargain, and I put u. d. {under duress} after my signature. It all started because I was forced to file a lawsuit against ross glennon lavin- Burnet county atty. for corruption of his office. and he actually had 15 grand jury indictments pending against him. Then they handed the whole thing over to the state bar of texas, who inturn let him walk free.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

247th

T1:

Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

2

T6:

T7:

crystlgib@yahoo.com

Date:

November 01, 2004

Brief Comments

Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums, ordered me to present another adult for a deposition and to serve that adult with the notice. I am party to the suit and can not be required to present another competent party. When I was unable to comply with the order Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums ordered I pay over $1000 in court cost and attorney fees. On the next hearing she grossly displayed bias stating that she in the event the opposing council makes allegations without proof she would take their word over mine. The opposing council submitted a sworn affidavit making herself a material witness in the case, but was not removed as council. Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums then signed a writ of attachment removing my children from my custody based solely on the opposing councils hearsay testimony.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

247th

T1:

Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

2

T6:

T7:

crystlgib@yahoo.com

Date:

November 01, 2004

Brief Comments

Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums, ordered me to present another adult for a deposition and to serve that adult with the notice. I am party to the suit and can not be required to present another competent party. When I was unable to comply with the order Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums ordered I pay over $1000 in court cost and attorney fees. On the next hearing she grossly displayed bias stating that she in the event the opposing council makes allegations without proof she would take their word over mine. The opposing council submitted a sworn affidavit making herself a material witness in the case, but was not removed as council. Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums then signed a writ of attachment removing my children from my custody based solely on the opposing councils hearsay testimony.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

247th

T1:

Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

2

T6:

T7:

crystlgib@yahoo.com

Date:

November 01, 2004

Brief Comments

Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums, ordered me to present another adult for a deposition and to serve that adult with the notice. I am party to the suit and can not be required to present another competent party. When I was unable to comply with the order Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums ordered I pay over $1000 in court cost and attorney fees. On the next hearing she grossly displayed bias stating that she in the event the opposing council makes allegations without proof she would take their word over mine. The opposing council submitted a sworn affidavit making herself a material witness in the case, but was not removed as council. Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums then signed a writ of attachment removing my children from my custody based solely on the opposing councils hearsay testimony.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

247th

T1:

Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

2

T6:

T7:

crystlgib@yahoo.com

Date:

November 01, 2004

Brief Comments

Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums, ordered me to present another adult for a deposition and to serve that adult with the notice. I am party to the suit and can not be required to present another competent party. When I was unable to comply with the order Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums ordered I pay over $1000 in court cost and attorney fees. On the next hearing she grossly displayed bias stating that she in the event the opposing council makes allegations without proof she would take their word over mine. The opposing council submitted a sworn affidavit making herself a material witness in the case, but was not removed as council. Judge Bonnie Crane Hellums then signed a writ of attachment removing my children from my custody based solely on the opposing councils hearsay testimony.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

245

T1:

Annette Galik

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

1997

T5:

1

T6:

3

T7:

sunny_283@hotmail.com

Date:

October 26, 2004

Brief Comments

Judge Galik was terribly biased, awarding 2 young children, child support and unequal division of property to husband on day-pass from rehab. Ignored police report of domestic violence to mother and denied request for drug testing. Mother is spec ed teacher and was not deemed unfit in any way. Apparently, Galik has something against women.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

245

T1:

Annette Galik

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

1997

T5:

1

T6:

3

T7:

sunny_283@hotmail.com

Date:

October 26, 2004

Brief Comments

Judge Galik was terribly biased, awarding 2 young children, child support and unequal division of property to husband on day-pass from rehab. Ignored police report of domestic violence to mother and denied request for drug testing. Mother is spec ed teacher and was not deemed unfit in any way. Apparently, Galik has something against women.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

245

T1:

Annette Galik

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

1997

T5:

1

T6:

3

T7:

sunny_283@hotmail.com

Date:

October 26, 2004

Brief Comments

Judge Galik was terribly biased, awarding 2 young children, child support and unequal division of property to husband on day-pass from rehab. Ignored police report of domestic violence to mother and denied request for drug testing. Mother is spec ed teacher and was not deemed unfit in any way. Apparently, Galik has something against women.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

312

T1:

Sqier

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

1

T6:

6

T7:

gr1988one@hotmail.com

Date:

October 12, 2004

Brief Comments

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

313

T1:

Pat Sheldon

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

T6:

4

T7:

Date:

October 11, 2004

Brief Comments

This judge is so unfair and very rude to anyone.He does not want to give anyone a chance or listen to them he got his mind made up.It's about C.P.S. and getting my niece out and adopted to me.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Hardin

The case was in a::

District Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

88th Judicial

T1:

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

Year of Case:

1995

T5:

7

T6:

T7:

Date:

October 11, 2004

Brief Comments

Judge Earl Stover II, Judge of the 88th Judicial District of Hardin County, should have recuse himself as he had done business with the defendant 3years prior to the trial.He was guilty of "the Color of Law" He acepted the defendents Summary Judgemt knowing the defendents commited perjury because of fradulent evidence in their Summary Judgement

T2:

Texas

T3:

Hardin

The case was in a::

District Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

88th Judicial

T1:

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

Year of Case:

1995

T5:

7

T6:

T7:

Date:

October 11, 2004

Brief Comments

Judge Earl Stover II, Judge of the 88th Judicial District of Hardin County, should have recuse himself as he had done business with the defendant 3years prior to the trial.He was guilty of "the Color of Law" He acepted the defendents Summary Judgemt knowing the defendents commited perjury because of fradulent evidence in their Summary Judgement

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

T1:

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

1998

T5:

2

T6:

18

T7:

azteca3000@hotmail.com

Date:

October 08, 2004

Brief Comments

I was never given a chance to prove my innocense. Alvin Nunnery just made me sign the 2 years TDCJ without me even having a hearing . Said that Caprice Cosper was going to put me under the jail . Because of the Forgery. I paid the Jim Mulins the 2,500.00 For the 1992 Chevy Cammaro.AND The car belonged to Gary Groves.Jim Mulins said he had a lien on it because gary Groves couldn't pay for the Transmission that Jim Mulins had installed in it. And he wouldn't sign the tital over to me . Because he didn't want to sell the car. Jim Mulins was the one that sold me the car. That's who I gave the money. I didn't even get a chance to get my money that I had invested in the car . I had tinted the windows . Bought new tires on it. Insurance on it. Man you harris county really did me wrong I didn't do nothing.I want my case brought back up from the Mandated Dismissal . It's not fair them guys robbed me and you helped them.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

T4:

T1:

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

1998

T5:

2

T6:

18

T7:

azteca3000@hotmail.com

Date:

October 08, 2004

Brief Comments

I was never given a chance to prove my innocense. Alvin Nunnery just made me sign the 2 years TDCJ without me even having a hearing . Said that Caprice Cosper was going to put me under the jail . Because of the Forgery. I paid the Jim Mulins the 2,500.00 For the 1992 Chevy Cammaro.AND The car belonged to Gary Groves.Jim Mulins said he had a lien on it because gary Groves couldn't pay for the Transmission that Jim Mulins had installed in it. And he wouldn't sign the tital over to me . Because he didn't want to sell the car. Jim Mulins was the one that sold me the car. That's who I gave the money. I didn't even get a chance to get my money that I had invested in the car . I had tinted the windows . Bought new tires on it. Insurance on it. Man you harris county really did me wrong I didn't do nothing.I want my case brought back up from the Mandated Dismissal . It's not fair them guys robbed me and you helped them.

T2:

MISSOURI

T3:

JACKSON

The case was in a::

District Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

DIV 8

T1:

JUDGE PEGGY MCGRAW

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

2001

T5:

4

T6:

T7:

CORPSERVINC@YAHOO.COM

Date:

September 12, 2004

Brief Comments

Please accept this as my formal complaint against Judge McGraw for abusing her discretion and ignoring the law to the point of committing a miscarriage of justice ON MY CASE NO. 16-CV-97-31020 BY TAKING AWAY MY DEFAULT JUDGEMENT as follows:

1) Violating Supreme Court Rule 74.05(d) and 74.06(c), which requires motions to vacate or set aside a judgement be filed within one (1) year after entry of judgment. Judge Wells entered his Interlocutory Judgment on June 7, 1999, there was never any appeal from this order; Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside was filed on November 27, 2000 and Judge McGraw set aside the judgement on January 29, 2001, all over a year and a half later. By failing to file his motion to vacate or set aside within "one year after the judgment or order was entered," Rule 74.06(c), Defendant did not preserve his contentions of error. See Beatty, 923 S.W.2d at 457; Orrock v. Crouse Realtors, Inc., 813 S.W.2d 929, 931 (Mo.App. 1991). Nor was there any error committed on the basis that the Defendant had “not been properly served”...clearly the evidence shows he was served. In fact, the record is devoid of any competent evidence that the Defendant did not receive a copy of the petition. This along with the following points creates, an abuse of discretion and a violation of Supreme Court Rules and the law (See enclosed WI certificate of service, Affidavit of Defendant’s Brother stating he sent the petition which resulted in pleadings being filed by out of state attorneys and pro se by the Defendant, FL process server return containing statement of Mother claiming Defendant live in WI, also there is a 1995 letter from Defendant wherein he states he is living in WI).

More importantly, there was no Hearing on the aforesaid Motion to Set Aside. There was no Evidence presented. There was no Affidavit filed with Defendant’s Motion. “a motion to set aside a judgment cannot prove itself." Clark, 926 S.W.2d at 127. "Even if a motion contains sufficient allegations of fact to support setting aside a judgment, the motion cannot normally be granted unless it is verified, or supported by affidavits or sworn testimony produced at a hearing on the motion." Id. In fact, there has been no discovery and no hearings throughout this entire case, excepting the default judgement hearing by Judge Wells!

2) Judge McGraw continues with her abuse of discretion and improper orders when she first “OVERRULES” Defendant Salchert’s Motion to Dismiss on January 29, 2001, and then “SUSTAINED” the motion to Dismiss on November 28, 2001, again without hearing or any evidence presented whatsoever from the Defendant. (See highlighted in yellow enclosed copies of orders)

3) According to C.J.S., certain parts of the orders from Judge Wells are not appealable. Orders for an accounting, an order upholding jurisdiction, an order upholding the subject matter jurisdiction of the court, an order for attorneys fees and costs where the amount is not determined, and equitable orders. (Grounds v. Lett, App. Dallas, 718 S.W. 2d 38.; Cigna Ins. Co. v. Brisson, 744 S.W. 2d, 716, 294 Ark. 504; Maxwell v. Maxwell, App. 748 S.W. 2d 78).

4) There was never any decision by Judge McGraw, nor hearing, nor evidence presented to the court stating that Gerald Salchert did not have contact with me by letters and phone calls here in MO. In fact, there are copies of his signed letters and account statements attached to my Plaintiff’s pleadings in the case file. Additionally, no evidence was presented by Defendant denying the mailing of monies to be deposited from here in MO from my MO bank account for my pension and profit sharing account formed by my MO corporation. Again, a motion to set aside a judgment cannot prove itself." Clark, 926 S.W.2d at 127. "Even if a motion contains sufficient allegations of fact to support setting aside a judgment, the motion cannot normally be granted unless it is verified, or supported by affidavits or sworn testimony produced at a hearing on the motion." Id. Yet, amazingly, the Court of Appeals determines (by assumption), that Judge McGraw really dismissed the case because there was not sufficient minimum contacts, without any evidence to support the same presented by Affidavit or Hearing or Discovery or Testimony... and nothing in her Orders so stating.... and in light of considerable evidence from me to the contrary attached as Exhibits or in my Affidavits. Finally, the Appellate Court decision is in direct conflict with the most recent U.S. Supreme Court Case on the matter which states:

Supreme Court's 1984 decision in “Calder v. Jones. It found relevant that in the lawsuit, petitioners were "charged with intentional, and allegedly tortious, actions ... expressly aimed at California." The Court reasoned that if the editor and reporter had allegedly aimed at Jones in California, and hit their mark, then they were duty-bound to meet her in Court there to address her wounds.”

5) If the allegations in a petition invoke principles of substantive law entitling the Plaintiff to relief, the petition is not to be dismissed. If there are genuine questions of material fact the petition is not to be dismissed. Yet, Judge McGraw abused her discretion and proceeded to dismiss the case. (Please see legal cites on page 5 & 6 of Appeal Brief).

6) Defendant Salchert’s renewed motions on personal jurisdiction, minimum contact, etc. were barred legally by the doctrine of collateral estoppel, res judicata and laches as he had already made these arguments pro se and with an out of state CA attorney and been denied these motions by Judge Wells Order. Why should Judge McGraw be allowed to step into this case almost 2 years later and totally change everything without even a hearing or submission of any evidence??? Since when is her wisdom, discretion and legal knowledge superior to that of a senior Judge on the bench??? Do his orders bear no weight or consideration such that she can ignore his orders and set them aside?

7) Judge McGraw has made contradictory orders in this case and abused her discretion on this case not to mention performing a considerable disservice to me personally on this matter. Basically, my only chance at obtaining a judgment against these criminals has been thrown away, not to mention the time and expense I and my attorney have expended over the last 5 years in trying to obtain a judgment, domesticate the foreign judgment and try to collect not knowing where the money is actually hidden at. Her lack of empathy for my plight is unacceptable, unprofessional and wholly void of any justice for me whatsoever. Respectfully,

Stuart N. Auld

T2:

MISSOURI

T3:

JACKSON

The case was in a::

District Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

DIV 8

T1:

JUDGE PEGGY MCGRAW

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

2001

T5:

4

T6:

T7:

CORPSERVINC@YAHOO.COM

Date:

September 12, 2004

Brief Comments

Please accept this as my formal complaint against Judge McGraw for abusing her discretion and ignoring the law to the point of committing a miscarriage of justice ON MY CASE NO. 16-CV-97-31020 BY TAKING AWAY MY DEFAULT JUDGEMENT as follows:

1) Violating Supreme Court Rule 74.05(d) and 74.06(c), which requires motions to vacate or set aside a judgement be filed within one (1) year after entry of judgment. Judge Wells entered his Interlocutory Judgment on June 7, 1999, there was never any appeal from this order; Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside was filed on November 27, 2000 and Judge McGraw set aside the judgement on January 29, 2001, all over a year and a half later. By failing to file his motion to vacate or set aside within "one year after the judgment or order was entered," Rule 74.06(c), Defendant did not preserve his contentions of error. See Beatty, 923 S.W.2d at 457; Orrock v. Crouse Realtors, Inc., 813 S.W.2d 929, 931 (Mo.App. 1991). Nor was there any error committed on the basis that the Defendant had “not been properly served”...clearly the evidence shows he was served. In fact, the record is devoid of any competent evidence that the Defendant did not receive a copy of the petition. This along with the following points creates, an abuse of discretion and a violation of Supreme Court Rules and the law (See enclosed WI certificate of service, Affidavit of Defendant’s Brother stating he sent the petition which resulted in pleadings being filed by out of state attorneys and pro se by the Defendant, FL process server return containing statement of Mother claiming Defendant live in WI, also there is a 1995 letter from Defendant wherein he states he is living in WI).

More importantly, there was no Hearing on the aforesaid Motion to Set Aside. There was no Evidence presented. There was no Affidavit filed with Defendant’s Motion. “a motion to set aside a judgment cannot prove itself." Clark, 926 S.W.2d at 127. "Even if a motion contains sufficient allegations of fact to support setting aside a judgment, the motion cannot normally be granted unless it is verified, or supported by affidavits or sworn testimony produced at a hearing on the motion." Id. In fact, there has been no discovery and no hearings throughout this entire case, excepting the default judgement hearing by Judge Wells!

2) Judge McGraw continues with her abuse of discretion and improper orders when she first “OVERRULES” Defendant Salchert’s Motion to Dismiss on January 29, 2001, and then “SUSTAINED” the motion to Dismiss on November 28, 2001, again without hearing or any evidence presented whatsoever from the Defendant. (See highlighted in yellow enclosed copies of orders)

3) According to C.J.S., certain parts of the orders from Judge Wells are not appealable. Orders for an accounting, an order upholding jurisdiction, an order upholding the subject matter jurisdiction of the court, an order for attorneys fees and costs where the amount is not determined, and equitable orders. (Grounds v. Lett, App. Dallas, 718 S.W. 2d 38.; Cigna Ins. Co. v. Brisson, 744 S.W. 2d, 716, 294 Ark. 504; Maxwell v. Maxwell, App. 748 S.W. 2d 78).

4) There was never any decision by Judge McGraw, nor hearing, nor evidence presented to the court stating that Gerald Salchert did not have contact with me by letters and phone calls here in MO. In fact, there are copies of his signed letters and account statements attached to my Plaintiff’s pleadings in the case file. Additionally, no evidence was presented by Defendant denying the mailing of monies to be deposited from here in MO from my MO bank account for my pension and profit sharing account formed by my MO corporation. Again, a motion to set aside a judgment cannot prove itself." Clark, 926 S.W.2d at 127. "Even if a motion contains sufficient allegations of fact to support setting aside a judgment, the motion cannot normally be granted unless it is verified, or supported by affidavits or sworn testimony produced at a hearing on the motion." Id. Yet, amazingly, the Court of Appeals determines (by assumption), that Judge McGraw really dismissed the case because there was not sufficient minimum contacts, without any evidence to support the same presented by Affidavit or Hearing or Discovery or Testimony... and nothing in her Orders so stating.... and in light of considerable evidence from me to the contrary attached as Exhibits or in my Affidavits. Finally, the Appellate Court decision is in direct conflict with the most recent U.S. Supreme Court Case on the matter which states:

Supreme Court's 1984 decision in “Calder v. Jones. It found relevant that in the lawsuit, petitioners were "charged with intentional, and allegedly tortious, actions ... expressly aimed at California." The Court reasoned that if the editor and reporter had allegedly aimed at Jones in California, and hit their mark, then they were duty-bound to meet her in Court there to address her wounds.”

5) If the allegations in a petition invoke principles of substantive law entitling the Plaintiff to relief, the petition is not to be dismissed. If there are genuine questions of material fact the petition is not to be dismissed. Yet, Judge McGraw abused her discretion and proceeded to dismiss the case. (Please see legal cites on page 5 & 6 of Appeal Brief).

6) Defendant Salchert’s renewed motions on personal jurisdiction, minimum contact, etc. were barred legally by the doctrine of collateral estoppel, res judicata and laches as he had already made these arguments pro se and with an out of state CA attorney and been denied these motions by Judge Wells Order. Why should Judge McGraw be allowed to step into this case almost 2 years later and totally change everything without even a hearing or submission of any evidence??? Since when is her wisdom, discretion and legal knowledge superior to that of a senior Judge on the bench??? Do his orders bear no weight or consideration such that she can ignore his orders and set them aside?

7) Judge McGraw has made contradictory orders in this case and abused her discretion on this case not to mention performing a considerable disservice to me personally on this matter. Basically, my only chance at obtaining a judgment against these criminals has been thrown away, not to mention the time and expense I and my attorney have expended over the last 5 years in trying to obtain a judgment, domesticate the foreign judgment and try to collect not knowing where the money is actually hidden at. Her lack of empathy for my plight is unacceptable, unprofessional and wholly void of any justice for me whatsoever. Respectfully,

Stuart N. Auld

T2:

MISSOURI

T3:

JACKSON

The case was in a::

District Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

DIV 8

T1:

JUDGE PEGGY MCGRAW

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

2001

T5:

4

T6:

T7:

CORPSERVINC@YAHOO.COM

Date:

September 12, 2004

Brief Comments

Please accept this as my formal complaint against Judge McGraw for abusing her discretion and ignoring the law to the point of committing a miscarriage of justice ON MY CASE NO. 16-CV-97-31020 BY TAKING AWAY MY DEFAULT JUDGEMENT as follows:

1) Violating Supreme Court Rule 74.05(d) and 74.06(c), which requires motions to vacate or set aside a judgement be filed within one (1) year after entry of judgment. Judge Wells entered his Interlocutory Judgment on June 7, 1999, there was never any appeal from this order; Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside was filed on November 27, 2000 and Judge McGraw set aside the judgement on January 29, 2001, all over a year and a half later. By failing to file his motion to vacate or set aside within "one year after the judgment or order was entered," Rule 74.06(c), Defendant did not preserve his contentions of error. See Beatty, 923 S.W.2d at 457; Orrock v. Crouse Realtors, Inc., 813 S.W.2d 929, 931 (Mo.App. 1991). Nor was there any error committed on the basis that the Defendant had “not been properly served”...clearly the evidence shows he was served. In fact, the record is devoid of any competent evidence that the Defendant did not receive a copy of the petition. This along with the following points creates, an abuse of discretion and a violation of Supreme Court Rules and the law (See enclosed WI certificate of service, Affidavit of Defendant’s Brother stating he sent the petition which resulted in pleadings being filed by out of state attorneys and pro se by the Defendant, FL process server return containing statement of Mother claiming Defendant live in WI, also there is a 1995 letter from Defendant wherein he states he is living in WI).

More importantly, there was no Hearing on the aforesaid Motion to Set Aside. There was no Evidence presented. There was no Affidavit filed with Defendant’s Motion. “a motion to set aside a judgment cannot prove itself." Clark, 926 S.W.2d at 127. "Even if a motion contains sufficient allegations of fact to support setting aside a judgment, the motion cannot normally be granted unless it is verified, or supported by affidavits or sworn testimony produced at a hearing on the motion." Id. In fact, there has been no discovery and no hearings throughout this entire case, excepting the default judgement hearing by Judge Wells!

2) Judge McGraw continues with her abuse of discretion and improper orders when she first “OVERRULES” Defendant Salchert’s Motion to Dismiss on January 29, 2001, and then “SUSTAINED” the motion to Dismiss on November 28, 2001, again without hearing or any evidence presented whatsoever from the Defendant. (See highlighted in yellow enclosed copies of orders)

3) According to C.J.S., certain parts of the orders from Judge Wells are not appealable. Orders for an accounting, an order upholding jurisdiction, an order upholding the subject matter jurisdiction of the court, an order for attorneys fees and costs where the amount is not determined, and equitable orders. (Grounds v. Lett, App. Dallas, 718 S.W. 2d 38.; Cigna Ins. Co. v. Brisson, 744 S.W. 2d, 716, 294 Ark. 504; Maxwell v. Maxwell, App. 748 S.W. 2d 78).

4) There was never any decision by Judge McGraw, nor hearing, nor evidence presented to the court stating that Gerald Salchert did not have contact with me by letters and phone calls here in MO. In fact, there are copies of his signed letters and account statements attached to my Plaintiff’s pleadings in the case file. Additionally, no evidence was presented by Defendant denying the mailing of monies to be deposited from here in MO from my MO bank account for my pension and profit sharing account formed by my MO corporation. Again, a motion to set aside a judgment cannot prove itself." Clark, 926 S.W.2d at 127. "Even if a motion contains sufficient allegations of fact to support setting aside a judgment, the motion cannot normally be granted unless it is verified, or supported by affidavits or sworn testimony produced at a hearing on the motion." Id. Yet, amazingly, the Court of Appeals determines (by assumption), that Judge McGraw really dismissed the case because there was not sufficient minimum contacts, without any evidence to support the same presented by Affidavit or Hearing or Discovery or Testimony... and nothing in her Orders so stating.... and in light of considerable evidence from me to the contrary attached as Exhibits or in my Affidavits. Finally, the Appellate Court decision is in direct conflict with the most recent U.S. Supreme Court Case on the matter which states:

Supreme Court's 1984 decision in “Calder v. Jones. It found relevant that in the lawsuit, petitioners were "charged with intentional, and allegedly tortious, actions ... expressly aimed at California." The Court reasoned that if the editor and reporter had allegedly aimed at Jones in California, and hit their mark, then they were duty-bound to meet her in Court there to address her wounds.”

5) If the allegations in a petition invoke principles of substantive law entitling the Plaintiff to relief, the petition is not to be dismissed. If there are genuine questions of material fact the petition is not to be dismissed. Yet, Judge McGraw abused her discretion and proceeded to dismiss the case. (Please see legal cites on page 5 & 6 of Appeal Brief).

6) Defendant Salchert’s renewed motions on personal jurisdiction, minimum contact, etc. were barred legally by the doctrine of collateral estoppel, res judicata and laches as he had already made these arguments pro se and with an out of state CA attorney and been denied these motions by Judge Wells Order. Why should Judge McGraw be allowed to step into this case almost 2 years later and totally change everything without even a hearing or submission of any evidence??? Since when is her wisdom, discretion and legal knowledge superior to that of a senior Judge on the bench??? Do his orders bear no weight or consideration such that she can ignore his orders and set them aside?

7) Judge McGraw has made contradictory orders in this case and abused her discretion on this case not to mention performing a considerable disservice to me personally on this matter. Basically, my only chance at obtaining a judgment against these criminals has been thrown away, not to mention the time and expense I and my attorney have expended over the last 5 years in trying to obtain a judgment, domesticate the foreign judgment and try to collect not knowing where the money is actually hidden at. Her lack of empathy for my plight is unacceptable, unprofessional and wholly void of any justice for me whatsoever. Respectfully,

Stuart N. Auld

T2:

TX

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

257th

T1:

Linda Motherall

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

1997

T5:

T6:

3

T7:

randylernstrn@yahoo.com

Date:

August 13, 2004

Brief Comments

Judge Motherall informed all of us who were in her courtroom that she was going to "set a precedent in the State of TX." TX law mandated that a judge cannot "stack" sentences. A jury can, but a judge cannot. She decided to sentence me 6 months in jail X 4, a clear violation of the law. She told me, "If you don't like it, you can appeal." I couldn't afford the lawyer I had, let alone appeal it. For Contempt of Court, (a third degree misdeameanor) I was sentenced to 2 years in jail. I went to jail 3 weeks before completing my first semester in nursing school. I had gone back to school at 40 to get an RN so that I could get a decent job and pay off the arrearage in child support. Her choice to "punish" me put me a year behind in obtaining my RN. During the divorce in '85 and a custody hearing in '86, it was very evident to me that she doesn't like men. Both times that I appeared before her ('85-'86) she was at the height of her maternal instinct (pregnant)! I've been dealing with her since 11/85 and have NEVER been treated fairly in her court.

T2:

texas

T3:

The case was in a::

State Appellant Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

9

T1:

all of them in 9

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

03

T5:

11

T6:

8

T7:

caporina@yahoo.com

Date:

August 07, 2004

Brief Comments

The full body of this message is In my opinion: After purchasing a business, we discovered the business existed from revenues that were over approx 80% fraud. It was a dentist named Dr. Merl Ewton and his wife Ann D. Ewton. They just billed and billed insurance for work they never done or ever intended to do.

The criminals we bought the business from sold the business with seller financing with 50,000 down, We made one payment before we hired a lawyer. We sued each other back in 1993, several years passed we spent a fortune on legal fees, the lawyers were getting richer and richer (remember your judge is a lawyer too.) 4-5 years later, my lawyer called me a said "if you don't prosecute this case, it will be dismissed and that wll be the end of it" I said well sounds good to me, I know I'm never going to get money from those slippery poeple. The Ewtons will just put the their blood money in an off shore account and pay them selves out of trust. So let the case die..they know they will lose.

Okay 10 years go by and The Ewton's want a malpracticing claim on their own lawyer for not prosecuting. (one last clever insurance scam) Their lawyer, Ted Cox tries to get a "bill of review" and bring the case back to trail. ouch, $15,000 later I defeat Ted. Ted appeals and "lobbies" until he got it to district 9, he pulls it off. It's over turned, the supreme court denied it. so both courts goofed or had unethical motivations we will never discover.

Some years ago, Congressman Dutton sposered the Bill of Review to become law, you would of thought he failed but he didn't really. "Bill of Review" was vetoed by George Bush back when he was Govenor, yet the court thinks it's a law? How is that? Now I got to go back to trail, (even though my law makers thought I should not have to). To add to the story, Much of the best evidence was burned by someone in a fire?? Gee I wonder who? But Don't worry I still got enough evidence hidden away to win all over again. The courts are there for the people and not the lawyers. Judges are lawyers and forgot about us real people some years ago. Republican judges try to act like their for the peole, but why was this case not get heard? Are there no real constructionist conservative judges. Do judges parade around like a conservative an but in secret, behave like a pro-law business lobbiest. Who get's them elected, Have you ever tried to go online an see who gives them the campaign money to win? 90 of their funds come from people who make money from law firms.

T2:

texas

T3:

The case was in a::

State Appellant Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

9

T1:

all of them in 9

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

03

T5:

11

T6:

8

T7:

caporina@yahoo.com

Date:

August 07, 2004

Brief Comments

The full body of this message is In my opinion: After purchasing a business, we discovered the business existed from revenues that were over approx 80% fraud. It was a dentist named Dr. Merl Ewton and his wife Ann D. Ewton. They just billed and billed insurance for work they never done or ever intended to do.

The criminals we bought the business from sold the business with seller financing with 50,000 down, We made one payment before we hired a lawyer. We sued each other back in 1993, several years passed we spent a fortune on legal fees, the lawyers were getting richer and richer (remember your judge is a lawyer too.) 4-5 years later, my lawyer called me a said "if you don't prosecute this case, it will be dismissed and that wll be the end of it" I said well sounds good to me, I know I'm never going to get money from those slippery poeple. The Ewtons will just put the their blood money in an off shore account and pay them selves out of trust. So let the case die..they know they will lose.

Okay 10 years go by and The Ewton's want a malpracticing claim on their own lawyer for not prosecuting. (one last clever insurance scam) Their lawyer, Ted Cox tries to get a "bill of review" and bring the case back to trail. ouch, $15,000 later I defeat Ted. Ted appeals and "lobbies" until he got it to district 9, he pulls it off. It's over turned, the supreme court denied it. so both courts goofed or had unethical motivations we will never discover.

Some years ago, Congressman Dutton sposered the Bill of Review to become law, you would of thought he failed but he didn't really. "Bill of Review" was vetoed by George Bush back when he was Govenor, yet the court thinks it's a law? How is that? Now I got to go back to trail, (even though my law makers thought I should not have to). To add to the story, Much of the best evidence was burned by someone in a fire?? Gee I wonder who? But Don't worry I still got enough evidence hidden away to win all over again. The courts are there for the people and not the lawyers. Judges are lawyers and forgot about us real people some years ago. Republican judges try to act like their for the peole, but why was this case not get heard? Are there no real constructionist conservative judges. Do judges parade around like a conservative an behave like a pro-law business lobbiest.

T2:

texas

T3:

The case was in a::

State Appellant Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

9

T1:

all of them in 9

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

03

T5:

11

T6:

8

T7:

caporina@yahoo.com

Date:

August 07, 2004

Brief Comments

The full body of this message is In my opinion: After purchasing a business, we discovered the business existed from revenues that were over approx 80% fraud. It was a dentist named Dr. Merl Ewton and his wife Ann D. Ewton. They just billed and billed insurance for work they never done or ever intended to do.

The criminals we bought the business from sold the business with seller financing with 50,000 down, We made one payment before we hired a lawyer. We sued each other back in 1993, several years passed we spent a fortune on legal fees, the lawyers were getting richer and richer (remember your judge is a lawyer too.) 4-5 years later, my lawyer called me a said "if you don't prosecute this case, it will be dismissed and that wll be the end of it" I said well sounds good to me, I know I'm never going to get money from those slippery poeple. The Ewtons will just put the their blood money in an off shore account and pay them selves out of trust. So let the case die..they know they will lose.

Okay 10 years go by and The Ewton's want a malpracticing claim on their own lawyer for not prosecuting. (one last clever insurance scam) Their lawyer, Ted Cox tries to get a "bill of review" and bring the case back to trail. ouch, $15,000 later I defeat Ted. Ted appeals and "lobbies" until he got it to district 9, he pulls it off. It's over turned, the supreme court denied it. so both courts goofed or had unethical motivations we will never discover.

Some years ago, Congressman Dutton sposered the Bill of Review to become law, you would of thought he failed but he didn't really. "Bill of Review" was vetoed by George Bush back when he was Govenor, yet the court thinks it's a law? How is that? Now I got to go back to trail, (even though my law makers thought I should not have to). To add to the story, Much of the best evidence was burned by someone in a fire?? Gee I wonder who? But Don't worry I still got enough evidence hidden away to win all over again. The courts are there for the people and not the lawyers. Judges are lawyers and forgot about us real people some years ago. Republican judges try to act like their for the peole, but why was this case not get heard? Are there no real constructionist conservative judges. Do judges parade around like a conservative an behave like a pro-law business lobbiest.

T2:

CA.

T3:

Siskiyou

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

01-50019

T1:

William Davis, ex asst. DA

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

ongoing

T6:

36

T7:

plaintuff@msn.com

Date:

August 05, 2004

Brief Comments

Juvenile matter/CPS. 9/26/03, lunitic Judge ruled, "Ms. Trevino (aka plaintuff@msn.com) is the most dedicated parent I have ever seen but she HAS to stop prosecuting CPS so I am giving them her children." Incredible ruling the Judge STILL gets away with! Hoping to stop him/it, in it's tracks soon.

T2:

Texas

T3:

harris

The case was in a::

District Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

312th

T1:

James D Squier

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

2003

T5:

2

T6:

T7:

daytonhane@aol.com

Date:

July 23, 2004

Brief Comments

I feel like my daughter has been denied her right to due process of law in her divorce. She filed the divorce two years ago, it is constantly being set off, even by the Ad Litem that was appointed for the children. her husband has had me under constant subpeona, I have to appear when no one else does, how is that right, now the case was set for the 27th and once again reset until the 21st of September. My granddaughter is 12 years old and now talking of suicide or running away. It is my opinion that the attorneys as well as the judge are not looking out for the best interest of the children.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

12

T1:

Robin Brown

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

2003

T5:

0

T6:

2

T7:

txusmc66@hotmail.com

Date:

June 30, 2004

Brief Comments

Dear Sir,

I am sending this to you and the judge to make you aware of the actions I am taking regarding the verdict of the case you handled. I am very unhappy in the decision regarding my firearm which I paid $400 dollars for. I wanted to make it known that I intend to get this letter as widely distributed as possible. I will make it known to news stations and local government officials in hopes of making sure the judge can not be re-elected. I will also take every legal action I can possibly find to campaign against you and the judge. I do not appreciate how I have been treated by you, your office, or the court. I am not a bad person. I am a patriot a veteran of the US Marines, and a reservist with the Texas ANG. I spend my weekends studying and coaching on a volunteer basis. If you had some personal problem with me or the U.S military there were other ways to handle those problems. Your job is to uphold the law and prosecute criminals. I do not believe that you or the judge are capable of doing your job and as a free citizen of the U.S. I believe you and this judge have lost sight of who the true criminals are. I am going to exercise my right of free speech to do everything possible to make sure you and the judge are removed from your position.

Semper Fi

Matthew Bounds

SSgt Texas ANG

(713) 256-7817

T2:

ILLINOIS

T3:

LAKE

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

NINETEENTH

T1:

ASSOCIATE J. JOSEPH P CONDON

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

Year of Case:

1996

T5:

EIGHT

T6:

4

T7:

dadstillherealways@comcast.net

Date:

June 26, 2004

Brief Comments

HAVE FOUND MYSELF IN ORDER OF PROGRESSION, IN FAMILY COURT, BANKRUPTCY COURT, CRIMMINAL COURT,STATE APPEALS, FEDERAL DISTRICT AND ONCE AGAIN IN FAMILY COURT , I have never exsperienced such unehtical, immoral and absolutly corrupt insanity anyplace or at any time in my life, I continue to fight yet,find myself mired in a cesspool with very few acceptable avenues of escape save the continued struggle. My life and the lives of my children hang in the balance. And so to does the very life blood of this once proud nation. My God be always at your side in the work that you do.

IF I HAD A DIME TO MY NAME I WOULD SUPPORT YOU AS A MEMBER.

T2:

TEXAS

T3:

HARRIS

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

257

T1:

LINDA MOTHERALL

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

1998

T5:

T6:

T7:

rgr5128@aol.com

Date:

June 13, 2004

Brief Comments

Linda Motherall has allowed a "scorned woman" to use our legal system through her courtroom since 1998 to wreak havoc in the lives of 2 precious little girls.

Motherall is against men. This fact is demonstrated by her actions and is well-known in the Harris Co Family court.

In this case, Motherall listened to & acted on lies of the mother with no proof and refused to hear the father's witnesses who came no less than 3 times to spend a day waiting to be heard... only to never be heard.

Motherall received recommendations from court officers that SHE appointed (ad litem, psychologist, mediator) who all said the father is a good father, loves his dtrs., his dtrs love him and he should have more than the standard time with his dtrs. Motherall denied standard visitation against their findings.

The mother in this case continues to deny the court-ordered visitation (minimal that it is)and continues behavior of parental & grandparent alienation without any penalty whatsoever. The father & his family in this case have not seen these 2 little girls for over 3 months now.

The father in this case has numerous, unrelated witnesses to his character, his fatherhood (he has 2 other children and 2 step-children who live with him and who are all happy, healthy, emotionally stable, active) - that Motherall refuses to hear.... including his step-son's father.

T2:

TEXAS

T3:

HARDIN

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

356TH AND 88TH

T1:

JUDGE BRITT PLUNK AND JUDGE EARL STOVER

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

2003

T5:

1

T6:

5 MONTHS

T7:

gettingstarted63@yahoo.com

Date:

April 10, 2004

Brief Comments

I HAVE HAD EXTREME PROBLEMS WITH TWO JUDGES IN HARDIN COUNTY, TEXAS. JUDGE BRITT PLUNK OF THE 356TH DISTRICT COURT AND JUDGE EARL STOVER OF THE 88TH DISTRICT COURT. IN AUGUST OF 2003 MY EX WIFE WAS CAUGHT HAVING AN AFFAIR WITH A FELLOW POLICE OFFICER THAT I WORK WITH. OUR EMPLOYER BECAME INVOLVED AND HE WAS AT RISK OF TERMINATION. MY WIFE FILED FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER WHICH THEY KNEW WOULD COST ME MY JOB. I ATTEMPTED TO FIGHT THE EX PARTE ORDER BY HAVING MY ATTORNEY FILE A MOTION TO VACATE THE ORDER. IN COURT MY ATTORNEY WAS INFORMED BY JUDGE PLUNK THAT HE WOULD ISSUE THE PROTECTIVE ORDER RATHER WE PROVED THE ALLEGATIONS WERE FALSE AND THAT EVERYONE IN THE COURT HOUSE KNEW SHE WAS LYING, BUT HE WAS GOING TO ISSUE IT BECAUSE OF LIABILITY. I CONTINUED TO TRY TO FIGHT IT, AND FAILED AND WAS NOT GIVEN THE HEARING. I WAS FORCED TO AGREE TO THE ORDER. IN THE PROCESS I ENDED UP ARRESTED, AND THROWN IN JAIL WHEN I ATTEMPTED TO GET MY CHILD FOR VISITATION. MY WIFE INFORMED THERE WERE NO ORDERS PENDING IN THE COURT, BUT VISITATION HAD BEEN SET NINE MONTHS BEFORE ALL THIS. WHEN I WAS ARRESTED, I WAS ACCUSED OF HOLDING POLICE OFFICERS AND MY WIFE AND CHILD AT GUN POINT. I WAS INDICTED FOR THE CHARGES WITH NO STATEMENTS OR PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVITS FILED BY ANY VICTIMS. I TOOK THE OFFENSES TO TRIAL AND I WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY. DURING MY TRIAL I WAS PUBLICITY FOR DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHARLIE ROACH WHO WAS UP FOR RE ELECTION. JUDGE PLUNK CONTINUALLY ALLOWED THE NEWS MEDIA TO POSITION THEIR CAMERAS AT GLASS DOORS AND PHOTOGRAPH THE PROCEDINGS. I MADE REQUEST THAT THIS NOT BE ALLOWED, BUT WAS TOLD IT WAS THE JUDGES RIGHT. HOW EVER I BELIEVE THERE IS A JUDICIAL CANON AND OPINION THAT THIS IS MISCONDUCT. AFTER I WAS RELEASED, I FOUND THAT MONEY THAT I HAD BEFORE MY MARRIAGE TO MY WIFE, SEPERATE PROPERTY, HAD BEEN AWARDED TO HER BY JUDGE EARL STOVER OF THE 88TH DISTRICT COURT. MY ATTORNEY NOR I WAS NOTIFIED OR SERVED WITH INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THE HEARING. THIS WAS EX PARTE COMMUNICATION BY JUDGE EARL STOVER. HE ALSO AUTHORIZED MY WIFE'S ATTORNEY TO BRING THE CHECK TO ME TO ENDORSE AND IF I REFUSED, THEN SHE WAS TO SIGN MY NAME TO THE CHECK AND CASE IT. MY WIFE NOR HER ATTORNEY EVER APPROACHED ME TO OBTAIN MY ENDORSEMENT. THEY JUST FORGED MY NAME AND CASHED THE CHECK. MY ATTORNEY FILED A MOTION TO STAY THE ORDER GIVING HER THE MONEY, BUT IT WAS IGNORED. ALSO AFTER I WAS RELEASED, MY WIFE'S ATTORNEY, BO HORKA OF KOUNTZE, TEXAS, FILE A MOTION TO MODIFY MY VISITATION. IN HIS MOTION, IT WAS REQUIRED HE SUBMIT A SWORN AFFIDAVIT OF THE REASON TO MODIFY, WHICH WAS NEVER SUBMITTED. HE HOW EVER DID STATE IN HIS PAPERWORK THAT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD, AND BECAUSE I HELD HIM AND MY WIFE AT GUN POINT, THAT I SHOULD BE RESTRICTED FROM SEEING THE CHILD. JUDGE PLUNK OF THE 356TH DISTRICT COURT, SIGNED THE ORDER WITHOUT THE AFFIDAVIT ATTACHED AS REQUIRED BY LAW. THE STRANGE PART IS THAT JUDGE PLUNK WAS THE JUDGE WHO PRESIDED OVER THE CRIMINAL CASES AND KNEW I HAD BEEN FOUND NOT GUILTY OF THE CRIMINAL OFFENSE I HAD BEEN CHARGED WITH AND HE KNEW THAT THE INFORMATION IN THE MOTION TO MODIFY WAS FALSE BECAUSE HE WAS THE JUDGE WHO HANDLE THE TRIAL AND KNEW I WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY. LATER AFTER NOT SEEING MY SON FOR A LONG TIME, JUDGE EARL STOVER THREW OUT THE MOTION TO MODIFY AT AN ATTEMPT AT A HEARING. HOWEVER, I DID FILE A MOTION FOR ENFORCEMENT FOR HER CONTINUED CONTEMPT OF COURT OFFENSE. NOTHING EVER WAS DONE WITH THE ENFORCEMENT REQUESTED, AND IT WAS IGNORED. IN THE FINAL DECREE OF DIVORCE MY ATTORNEY STATED THE LAW IN REGARDS TO SEPERATE PROPERTY AND THAT JUDGE EARL; STOVER DID NOT HAVE THE POWER TO DEVIDE SEPERATE PROPERTY, BUT RATHER HE COULD ONLY ENTER A FINDING OF THE MONEY GIVEN TO MY WIFE WAS MY SEPERATE PROPERTY AND THAT HER COULD ONLY PLACE A JUDGEMENT FOR WHO'S PROPERTY WAS SEPERATE AND HAVE IT RETURNED. THE MONEY I SPEAK OF, WAS FROM A HOME I BUILT BEFORE I MARRIED. THE FUNDS I PLACED INTO THE HOME, WERE FROM A SELL OF ANOTHER HOME THAT I HAD BEFORE THE MARRIED. ALL THE INCOME AND BANK RECORDS SHOWED IT WAS SEPERATE PROPERTY BEFORE THE MARRIAGE. HOWEVER MY WIFE AND HER ATTORNEY TOLD THE COURT( JUDGE STOVER) THAT SHE CONTRIBUTED MONEY INTO THE MONEY I PUT INTO THE HOME. THIS WAS FALSE AND SHE HAD NO DOCUMENTATION OR BANK RECORDS TO SHOW SHE EVEN MADE ANY MONEY TO PUT INTO THE HOME. JUDGE STOVER ABUSED HIS POWER AND AWARDED HER THE MONEY FOR BACK SUPPORT AND CHILD SUPPORT WHEN I HAD NEVER BEEN PREVIOUSLY ORDERED TO PAY ANY. HE HAD ALREADY GIVEN HER THE MONEY FOUR MONTHS EARLIER ILLEGALLY, AND SHE SUBMITTED A HAND WRIITEN PIECE OF PAPER SHOWING WHERE SHE SPENT IT ON CHILD CARE. $30,072.00 WORTH OF CHILD CARE IN 15 MONTHS! NO RECIEPTS, CANCELLED CHECKS, OR WITNESSES TO TESTIFY THE MONEY WAS SPENT ON CHILD CARE. THESE TWO JUDGES SEEM TO EXCEPT A LOT OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION. THEY ALSO DO NOT CARE WHAT THE LAW SAYS FOR THEM TO DO. I HAVE ATTEMPTED TO FILE PERJURY CHARGES AGAINST MY WIFE FOR REPEATED ACTS OF PERJURY IN OPEN COURT AND IN FILING FALSE AFFIDAVITS. THE COURT IS AWARE OF HER PERJURY OFFENSES, BUT CONTINUE TO IGNORE THEM. I HAVE SPENT THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS TRYING TO GET SOMETHING DONE WITH THE HARDIN COUNTY JUSTICE SYSTEM, AND I AM EVEN HAVING TO APPEAL STUFF NOW WITHOUT THE USE OF AN ATTORNEY. I CAN'T AFFORD IT ANY MORE. I WOULD REALLY LIKE TO SPEAK WITH ANYONE IN PERSON WHO CAN LEAD ME IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION. I AM NOT WORRIED ABOUT BEING CONFIDENTIAL. I NEED SOMETHING DONE. I LOST MY 20 YEAR CAREER AS A POLICE OFFICER, ALL MY MONEY I EVER EARNED, AND I HAVE EVEN BEEN FORCED TO MOVE FROM MY HOME IN HARDIN COUNTY TEXAS, AND COURT ORDERED BY JUDGE BRITT PLUNK TO LIVE IN STARKS, LOUISIANA WITH MY PARENTS. I'M A FORTY YEAR OLD MAN, AND IN A SMALL TOWN UNABLE TO GAIN EMPLOYMENT WITHOUT DRIVING 60 MILES EITHER WAY. I CAN'T EVEN GET MY OWN HOME TILL I CAN AFFORD TO GET HIS ORDER OVER TURNED. CAN YOU HELP? I HAVE BEEN FILING COMPLAINTS WITH THE STATE COMMISSION OF JUDICAL CONDUCT. I HAVE ALSO BEEN TRYING TO FIND WHERE TO GO TO GET A DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO PURSUE ALL THE CRIMES MY WIFE HAS COMMITTED. THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURES STATES A DISTRICT ATTORNEY SHALL REDUCE A COMPLAINT TO WRITING AND CAUSE THE SAME TO BE SWORN TO. I HAVE SUBMITTED SWORN AFFIDAVITS MANY TIMES AND HE IGNORES THEM. PLEASE HELP ME.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

007

T1:

Pam Derbyshire

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

T6:

T7:

nicoleandarthur03@yahoo.com

Date:

April 07, 2004

Brief Comments

Someone from Judge Pam Derbyshire's office called my boyfriend at 10:00 am on Monday morning and told him he had until 12 noon that day to be at the courthouse downtown or he would be going back to jail. In my opinion, they should have given him more time to get downtown. We were in Magnolia at the time and we barely made it there. She then told him he had until 4pm that same day to be at Atascosita for Boot Camp for 4 months, or she would hold him in contemp of court. This made me especially upset because she knows he has a 6 month old daughter at home that he NEEDS to provide for, and he can't provide for her while he is in Boot Camp. I have been out of work since she was born in October, and anyone who knows, it is very difficult to find a job today in America. Her response when my boyfriend told her that he is the family's provider, "Well, I guess the mother will just have to go get a job." It's not that easy to "just go get a job". My mother has been looking for employment for 6 months, and has been unable to find a job. In MY opinion, she is not a fair Judge.

T2:

texas

T3:

harris

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

184

T1:

Jan  Krocker

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

T5:

T6:

T7:

Date:

March 26, 2004

Brief Comments

ms krocker was observed on 032404 during a psi hearing she sat and went through the proceedings as if she was really doing the right thing she finished the hearing which was a sham . she sat and watched the case go through watched as the ada lied about information about a witnes on the stand and after all was said and done with out even acting like she was deliberating she ruled on this hearing after the defense closed and the state rested. as if to let every one in the court know that she had her mind made up when she came into the court room gave the person 60 yrs without even blinking her eyes. ms krocker is a dangerous woman sitting on the bench with her own hidden agenda.

T2:

KANSAS

T3:

JOHNSON

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

T1:

DAVIS AND JANET RUSSELL

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

97

T5:

T6:

T7:

SAMSMOOTHE@YAHOO.COM

Date:

February 23, 2004

Brief Comments

AGAIN FRAUD AND DECEIT WAS USED TO OBTAIN FAVORABLE JUDGEMENT...JUDGES WERE ADVISED OF CRIMINAL ACTS OF THE BENDERS AND ATTORNEY SCOTT KREAMER IN FALSE ARREST, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, SUBMITTING TAMPERED EVIDENCE, NOT SUPPLYING SUPENA DOCUMENTS, PERJURY, SUBORDINATION OF PERJURY, ETC...WENT TO APPELATE COURTS PRO SE...AGAIN NOTHING EVER DONE TO CORRECT THE CRIMINAL ACTS OF THESE PEOPLE AND THEIR ATTORNEY...PROPERTY TAKEN W/O COMPENSATION...SEVERAL CASES CRIMINAL AND CIVIL 95C13858 AND 95CR5401...AND 96C15566 AND 98C5434...JUDGES IGNORED CRIMINAL ACTS AND EVEN STATED "ITS TIME TO STOP THIS CASE"

T2:

KANSAS

T3:

JOHNSON

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

V8

T4:

T1:

JANET SHELDON

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

1989

T5:

T6:

T7:

SAMSMOOTHE@YAHOO.COM

Date:

February 23, 2004

Brief Comments

FRAUD AND DECEIT WAS USED TO OBTAIN A FAVORABLE JUDGEMENT...NEVER COMPENSATED FOR MY PREMARITAL AND FAMILY PROVIDED REAL ESTATE AND PERSONAL PROPERTY...EVEN TOOK MY PREMARITAL MOTORCYCLE AND GAVE TO MY EX..CALLED ME ARROGANT IN RULLING...AWARDED SOLE CUSTODY TO MY WIFE WHEN NOBODY PLEADED FOR IT AND THE HOUSE STUDY CAME BACK JOINT...NEVER FOLLOWED LAW TO PROVIDE ME WITH MY PREMARITAL PROPERTY AND AN EQUITABLE DIVISION OF THE MARITAL ESTATE...HAVE FILED NUMEROUS MOTIONS THROUGH THE YEARS AND EVEN APPEALED AND NOTHING HAS EVER BEEN DONE TO CORRECT UNEQUITABLE DIVISION AND TAKING OF PROPERTY W/O COMPENSATION. CASE 89C12712

T2:

Pennsylvania

T3:

Luzerne

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

T1:

Chester Muroski

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

2001

T5:

T6:

17

T7:

foxfirewalker@hlow3.net

Date:

February 22, 2004

Brief Comments

This was in a probate court. My mother's durable Power of Attorney designating me as her agent was utterly ignored and the state dept. of aging was appointed her guardian. In order to do that felony crimes were surpressed, abduction, fraud and grand theft then the Agency took over robbing my mother for everything and locking her up in a nursing facility, and isolating her from her daughter and POA, selling her home denying her benefit of one on one care in her home which she paid for thru a Long Term Care insurance policy she had purchased adn paid for since 1998. All civil rights have been denied against federal, state and professional practice codes.

T2:

Colorado

T3:

El Paso

The case was in a::

District Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

Division 6

T1:

Judge Steven Pelican

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

Year of Case:

2003

T5:

T6:

26

T7:

dkthorup@hotmail.com

Date:

February 20, 2004

Brief Comments

Judge Steven Pelican: condoned and perpetrated fraud and ethics violations by opposing counsel and a licensed professional counselor; denied due process by suppressing all of my testimonial and documentary evidence; and impeded an investigation into the ethics violations of the aforementioned LPC by a State Licensing Board. Said LPC was fraudulently introduced into my case by the Court in an attempt to justify their wrongful and unconstitutional ruling two years earlier. Said ruling suspended my parenting rights in violation of due process pursuant to 14-10-129 CRS as no evidence, let alone substantial and credible evidence, was ever presented in support of said ruling. Also, I was never given an opportunity to present any evidence in defense of said ruling.

T2:

Colorado

T3:

Denver

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

117M

T1:

Judge Robert Crew

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

Year of Case:

2002

T5:

T6:

4

T7:

dkthorup@hotmail.com

Date:

February 20, 2004

Brief Comments

Judge Robert Crew and Assistant Denver City Attorney, Christopher Lujan threatened and extorted a plea-bargain agreement from me, despite my innocence, in an effort to cover-up my wrongful arrest and jailing of nine-days. No warrant had ever been issued for my arrest and no warrant could be produced at my arraignment following nine days of incarceration, however, I was ordered to appear in Judge Crew's Court on charges unknown two months later. Judge Crew later pre-dated a warrant (that had never been issued) and recorded said warrant with the Denver County Court Clerk's Office sometime after my arraignment as their records confirmed. My witness list includes another Denver County Judge and another member of the Denver City Attorney's Office. The fraudulently constructed warrant alleged that I had made an angry telephone call to my estranged wife, however, a subpoena of her telephone records (and mine) failed to produce any record of the alleged call. Judge Crew also refused to assign a public defender to assist me with my defense. I had never previously nor subsequently been arrested for anything in my entire life.

T2:

Colorado

T3:

El Paso

The case was in a::

District Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

Division V

T1:

Magistrate Robert Erler

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

Year of Case:

2001

T5:

T6:

26

T7:

dkthorup@hotmail.com

Date:

February 20, 2004

Brief Comments

Magistrate Robert Erler: condoned and perpetrated fraud and ethics violations by opposing counsel and a licensed professional counselor; denied due process by suppressing all of my testimonial and documentary evidence; impeded an investigation into the ethics violations of the aforementioned LPC by a State Licensing Board; and orchestrated my wrongful arrest and jailing of nine-days under the fraudulent allegation that there was an outstanding warrant for my arrest in another County when no such warrant existed.

T2:

Colorado

T3:

El Paso

The case was in a::

District Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

Division 6

T1:

Judge Steven Pelican

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

Year of Case:

2003

T5:

T6:

26

T7:

Date:

February 20, 2004

Brief Comments

Judge Pelican: condoned and perpetrated fraud and ethics violations by opposing counsel and a licensed professional counselor; denied due process by suppressing all of my testimonial and documentary evidence; and impeded an investigation into the ethics violations of the aforementioned LPC by a State Licensing Board.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

T1:

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

2004

T5:

0

T6:

1

T7:

loveawake@webtv.net

Date:

February 20, 2004

Brief Comments

Judge Brown was unfair in her judgment of me, I believe. The offense for which I sought a petition for non-disclosure was indecent exposure. Not an offense to be taken lightly, granted, but it was an offense I was accused of almost 20 years ago. I have not been accused of a crime since or before that time. Incidentally, I was innocent of the offense. I could not afford to pay my lawyer at the time the cost of a trial so we plea bargained. I was given deferred adjudication (six months probation and a two hundred dollar fine). It did not go as a conviction. This stain on my record is causing me difficulty in my job search (I'm about to be layed off). The lawyer from the DA's office who was presemt and stood beside me as I was denied my petition, had previously said the petition was okay with him one week earlier, but Judge Brown, who had already left for the day, ordered the clerk to call me back and say she needed more information from the DA's office on the case. She refused to sign the petition at the time which I was told at the time would probably be a mere formality. The next week though she denied the petition. I would like to appeal her decision but I'm not sure I would be allowed to do that under law. I did not have a lawyer representing me this time which may have hurt my case but I couldn't afford one. I wasn't a registered voter before now, but you can rest assured I will register now and vote against Judge Brown in the next election and urge all my friends to do the same. Over 19 years is long enough for me to suffer the consequences of an action I didn't commit in the first place.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Harris

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

308

T1:

Georgia Dempster

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

Year of Case:

2000

T5:

3

T6:

3

T7:

DHenson1111@aol.com

Date:

February 11, 2004

Brief Comments

Judge Dempster totally threw away my constitutional rights to the care, custody, and nurture of my daughter.

My daughter was given to her Uncle and Aunt (Maternal) as Managing Conservators with absolutely no deference being given to my parental rights and no evidence that I would in any way "significantly impair" my daughter's physical health or emptional development.

I am currently trying to get my Petition to modify heard, but it has been over a year since it was filed and she has granted opposing attorney a 9 month continuance, in Sept. of 2003.

Judge Dempster ignored Texas State law as well as Federal Law when she gave custody of my daughter to nonparents.

T2:

Texas

T3:

Cameron

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

JP Los Fresnos TX

T1:

Judge of the Peace Ortiz

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

T5:

T6:

T7:

rubenuno@rgv.rr.com

Date:

February 10, 2004

Brief Comments

I made a contract with a couple living in Los Fresnos to trade a Pickup truck for a parcel of land. The lady's husband reneg on the contract and accused me of stealing the truck. The contract was notorized and both signed the contract as well as I. She contacted the JP of Los Frenos and he issued an order for my arrest. A constable came to my house to pick me up. He took me to the JP's office and there they arresed me, this happed two weeks ago. Today the same constable came to my house with a reposseion truck, and said that the truck was evidence and confiscated the truck. He had no papers of any kind. He said the DA and an investigator had sent him to my house. They took the truck and said for me to go to their office tomorrow, the JP's office. The JP's name is Ortiz of Los Fresnos, TX. Can this judge do this without hearing both sides of the story. I have the contract where they both signed and they also have a copy of the contract. I should this to the constabel and he said he had his orders from the JP and the DA's office, but he should me no papers of any kind, and said if I interferred he was going to arrest me and throw me in jai. Can you advice or help guide me.

T2:

T3:

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

V5

T4:

T1:

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

T5:

T6:

T7:

Date:

January 07, 2004

Brief Comments

T2:

Minnesota

T3:

Hennepin

The case was in a::

Federal District Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

V9

T4:

T1:

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

T5:

T6:

T7:

emerson1248@hotmail.com

Date:

December 22, 2003

Brief Comments

I was sent to federal prison for 6years with another 3 yrs of supervised release, after being convicted for 922o possesstion of a machinegun. The law and the sentance were and still are un-constitutional What is it that you propose to do to rectify these abuses of power if I join your group?

T2:

Virginia

T3:

Stafford

The case was in a::

District Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

2  Somewhat Fair / Equitable

T4:

703-658-8766

T1:

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

2002

T5:

T6:

T7:

sufi202@aol.com

Date:

December 17, 2003

Brief Comments

code section:46.2-862 6pts on record for 3 years and no company will take him because of reckless driving on 3/15/2002 rd in excess of 80 mps. he was taking me to work in DC when got ticket and put it on CDL. He was driving a car at that time. what can we do. a couple of weeks had a accident and total our car and gave him a reckless driving ticket. I know he can beat this because he hit a tree to keep from hitting another car. the officer gave him a ticket and toke him in ambulance to hospital and gave him a breath test. he passed it. He still has now a dislocated elbow that was put back in place and still not driving yet. paid reckless driving ticket that is on file of 2002.

T2:

Minnesota

T3:

Polk

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

k3-96-891

T1:

michael  kraker

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

1996

T5:

9 yrs

T6:

T7:

petesfarmftg@yahoo.com

Date:

December 12, 2003

Brief Comments

I was framed by a mock trial, no finding of probable cause nor a record of,judge kraker,prosecutor wayne swanson & alleged defense, kerry S Rosenquist knowingly conspired to gain a false conviction-at any price, witness & jury tapering,evidence is missing,illegal search/seizures.doyle errors,brady material was withheld,court lost jurisdiction, & the trial transcripts were falsified,denied compusory process, denied the right to testify in my behhalf, perjury,no factual,forensic, time frame investigation to allow perjury, judge refused to control prosecutor from leading question,improper vouching,giving unsworn testimony, claiming false evidence that does not exist & this is why Brady material was withhelp,prosecutor knowingly suborned perjury,loaded the jury

T2:

Minnesota

T3:

Polk

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

k3-96-891

T1:

michael  kraker

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

K3-9

T5:

9 yrs

T6:

T7:

petesfarmftg@yahoo.com

Date:

December 12, 2003

Brief Comments

I was framed by a mock trial, no finding of probable cause nor a record of,judge kraker,prosecutor wayne swanson & alleged defense, kerry S Rosenquist knowingly conspired to gain a false conviction-at any price, witness & jury tapering,evidence is missing,illegal search/seizures.doyle errors,brady material was withheld,court lost jurisdiction, & the trial transcripts were falsified,denied compusory process, denied the right to testify in my behhalf, perjury,no factual,forensic, time frame investigation to allow perjury, judge refused to control prosecutor from leading question,improper vouching,giving unsworn testimony, claiming false evidence that does not exist & this is why Brady material was withhelp,prosecutor knowingly suborned perjury,loaded the jury

T2:

Texas

T3:

Travis

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

6

T1:

Don Leonard -Visiting Judge

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

Year of Case:

2003

T5:

T6:

6

T7:

thebam@juno.com

Date:

November 11, 2003

Brief Comments

Was never cited for the offense nor was I allowed to cross- examine my accusor(the person who signed the complaint). The prosecutor, Bill Swaim, saw his chance to teach this pro se litigant a lesson... and he did.

T2:

Texas

T3:

La Salle

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

T1:

sallie alridge

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

2003

T5:

T6:

T7:

tlalok1@yahoo.com

Date:

November 09, 2003

Brief Comments

went to court on an insurance violation and license plates violation, when I went to court nobody was there representing the state so I told the magistrate that since nobody was there for the state she must dismiss the charge, she told me that she was not going to do that and that she will let me know by mail when to go to court. this is a violation of my right to due process. for she must magistrate me by law to tell me right then and there where to go to court the date address and the time. I had given the court notice by registered mail that I was coming and taht I requested someone there to keep a record, when I got there the judge was by herself and I brought a witness with me I have a copy of the notice to the magistrate and a receiopt from the post office.

T2:

Texas

T3:

La Salle

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

T1:

sallie alridge

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

2003

T5:

T6:

T7:

tlalok1@yahoo.com

Date:

November 09, 2003

Brief Comments

went to court on an insurance violation and license plates violation, when I went to court nobody was there representing the state so I told the magistrate that since nobody was there for the state she must dismiss the charge, she told me that she was not going to do that and that she will let me know by mail when to go to court. this is a violation of my right to due process. for she must magistrate me by law to tell me right then and there where to go to court the date address and the time. I had given the court notice by registered mail that I was coming and taht I requested someone there to keep a record, when I got there the judge was by herself and I brought a witness with me I have a copy of the notice to the magistrate and a receiopt from the post office.

T2:

Texas

T3:

La Salle

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

T1:

sallie alridge

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

2003

T5:

T6:

T7:

tlalok1@yahoo.com

Date:

November 09, 2003

Brief Comments

went to court on an insurance violation and license plates violation, when I went to court nobody was there representing the state so I told the magistrate that since nobody was there for the state she must dismiss the charge, she told me that she was not going to do that and that she will let me know by mail when to go to court. this is a violation of my right to due process. for she must magistrate me by law to tell me right then and there where to go to court the date address and the time. I had given the court notice by registered mail that I was coming and taht I requested someone there to keep a record, when I got there the judge was by herself and I brought a witness with me I have a copy of the notice to the magistrate and a receiopt from the post office.

T2:

Florida

T3:

Seminole

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

18TH

T1:

DONNA MCINTOSH

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

Year of Case:

2003

T5:

T6:

10

T7:

nananer77@earthlink.net

Date:

October 30, 2003

Brief Comments

My brother's homestead was foreclosed on by the 2nd mortgage holder and the 'new owner' just took possession yesterday after a court battle. This judge ignored sworn oaths/affidavits and only a copy of the note was presented in court. According to the Florida constitution Article X Sec. 4 a homestead is exempt from levy by the execution or process of any court but this was also ignored. The first mortgage foreclosure has not been adjudicated yet. Six sheriffs stormed my brother's house as the 'new owners' used the sheriffs as their collection agency and my brother was told that if he did not leave he would be arrested for trespass. They converted the claim and exercise of a constitutional right into a crime. The attorney lied and fabricated stories. I would like some justice for my brother who is now homeless. I have been there done that too. I am just sick about it. What can we do? I will gladly donate to your cause. I filed the court documents for my brother but should have been filing writs instead of motions.

T2:

Teaxs

T3:

Rusk

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

1

T1:

Darrel Hyatt

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

2002

T5:

1

T6:

T7:

terrytsrs@sbcglobal.net

Date:

October 04, 2003

Brief Comments

Judge Hyatt let the ex-wife off of 3 contempt charges for not letting myself have visitation with my son due to no pickup address in the visitation court documents and then ordered her attorney to add this to the court documents which have not been done to this date then I was put in contempt for being $208.00 behind in back child support but had made an extra payment of $170.00 in 2000 that was never credited to me , I have all documents proving this. In short I would had only been $38.00 behind in child support and this is my first offense so the judge found me in contempt and ask the ex-wifes attorney for his attorney fees were and he said he wasn't sure because he didnt have the figures, so the judge told him to estamate and the attorney pop off and said $5,000.00 so Iwas orded to pay $5,000.00 which I felt was very wrong to do.

T2:

T3:

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

T4:

T1:

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

T5:

T6:

T7:

Date:

September 28, 2003

Brief Comments

T2:

Texas

T3:

El Paso

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

383

T1:

Michael Herrera

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

2000

T5:

3.1

T6:

37

T7:

ycook@elp.rr.com

Date:

September 23, 2003

Brief Comments

I feel that the Judge was bias and unjust with the rulings in which he decided against me. Based on the Texas state laws of marriage a couple is declared married if living together for atleast 6 months, I lived with this particular person for a period of 18 months. Through out those 18 months I was pregnant and gave birth to our son. Because of abusive behavior from my common law husband I was forced to leave my home. He then sued me for custody. The judge later ruled against us being a common law marriage. Favoring my common law husband's wishes at that point. Through out this case hearing the judge has demonstrated bias and unjust behavior. This is just one detail amongst many that I am sure would prove obvious once someone with an unbias mind set will clearly see. I would like for this case to be reviewed in it's entirety by a qualified proffessional for a much better understanding of my complaint.

T2:

Masachusetts

T3:

Worceter

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

Worcester Superior COurt

T1:

Too many Read

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

Year of Case:

2003

T5:

T6:

T7:

NoJustice3000@hotmail.com

Date:

September 21, 2003

Brief Comments

Superior Court Docket 03-1361AProtest or call the numbers below…. Very Serious never let this happen to you Corruption, Cover-ups, and Lies…. I have a friend named Rebecca Heitmann who lives at 208 Main Street in Whitinsville, MA 01588. Or hopes to live there for a little longer. She was unemployed for about a year working as an Executive Assistant/Finances all in big companies and huge executives who we will not name for their privacy. In November 2002 she interviewed for a job at LaChance Financial also known as Bankers Capital in Marlborough, MA. To protect people some names will not be in here the rest will be. She was replacing an employee that was there for 9 years and offered a nice salary of 65K for a girl of 26. Mr. Lawrence LaChance decided to hire her. David Rabinovitz did not like it but had to do it because he is not the boss. He also hated her because she made more money by about 10K and was told Rebecca would be his boss. This is a small S-Corp only 6-7 employees tops that does Leasing for businesses and friends with B, C, D, Credit. People in other words people who need a loan bad and they will do it but they will charge you a ton of interest and put liens on everything. They have many friends with Banks and Loan Companies. They also have many Law enforcement friends. Please Read on. Since the previous employee was being forced out he would not sign a separation agreement at first. They then offered a 6K bonus with an incentive to train Rebecca and to do the Year End Audit. After months of waiting and them knowing she had financial problems, no job before that, and everything else still hired her. They did many interviews phone and in person from November 2002 to April 2003. They gave her original offer letter on April 2, 2003 and checked her references, background, and character in March 2003. She signed letting them check her background before starting the job. She started working there on April 16, 2003. During this time period the people who seemed very nice were not what they seemed. There is an employee there with Cancer who is abused daily yelled at after 9 years of never calling in for calling in after chemo. They told Rebecca that the other 2 male employees were gay which Rebecca can not say for a fact if they are or not. She does not care and it was never any of her business. Larry LaChance during this period starting sexually harassing her and trying to control her life calling every weekend to just talk or every night. He also kept her there until 9 or 10 and told her sit down who pays you. Out of fear of losing her job she stayed for awhile. Rebecca has a Husband have been married 7 years and he was not happy they were not business related calls. Larry LaChance has a wife but it he would, “rather die than go home to her” quote from another employee. Larry only hired Rebecca in the hopes he could take her on a Company trip to have sex with her all the way out in Omaha, Nebraska booked adjoining rooms. During this time the employee she replaced did not really have any desire to train her if I was him I wouldn’t but then agreed but time was running out. They would spend more time arguing about training than training. Larry was not happy with the training and after he left he wanted Rebecca to sign an affidavit against him that was totally overboard she refused. If she had signed it the 6K would have been hers. She is not a prostitute nor a slave you are an employee at will in this state of Massachusetts meaning you can leave or be fired at any time without any notice. Larry LaChance also assaulted Rebecca on two occasions by coming up out of nowhere and grabbing her by the back of the neck. After the second time she left she is strong. During that period of time David Rabinovitz his partner in crime because he only has that job to pay child support and owes Larry 30K or at did started telling her that Larry was President and could do as he wished. He is aiding Larry LaChance for any reasons. She immediately went to an Attorney who tried to get her wages she filed with the AG’s office for non- payment of wages. Rebecca’s Attorney decided to do a Demand Letter. She got two death threats and the Lawyer did not tell her to call the police just change her phone number because they will not help her. She cannot get a restraining order because in the state of MA it has to be a relationship like brother/sister etc… She had no such relationship. Larry LaChance lives 6 miles from her house. After Rebecca Left since the state will not do an MCAD complaint she filed a Criminal Harassment Complaint in Marlborough District Court on June 5, 2003. Right after she left they called her Refinance Company ruined that loan, called her current mortgage company told them she would never get a job to start to foreclose on the house. Since they work with banks they can do that somehow and called all her past employers threatened them not to give a reference. They then called and threatened her references if they did not say they lied they would get sued one did it the other did not. On July 7 or 8, 2003 LaChance Financial was served with the Criminal Harassment Complaint on July 11, 2003 they got an Ex-Parte hearing in front of Judge Gantz in Worcester, MA. The suit does not even state any statutes or anything just under information and belief with false documents and no real solid proof. They went to a different jurisdiction and County and Rebecca was not there to defend herself. Ex-Parte means the other party is not there. They claim that she took the job to extract a settlement out of them to make a baseless sexual harassment claim, and many other false claims they have not proven, and that she had made this claim to all her former employers. None of her employers are providing information and want nothing to do with this. One got threatened badly and does intend to help if they ever get in front of a Judge. They are also providing not providing Lachine or their Civil Lawyer Jeffrey Greenberg with anything because she never made a Sexual Harassment claim against any of them. The reference who perjured herself is Teresia LaFleur/Campbell there is proof and she signed on July 11, 2003 a false affidavit out of fear of losing her job her Husband Dennis Campbell just got a job at Harvard as a Professor and they threatened to make sure they would lose their jobs if not signed. The empyer that will testify to say that Rebecca and Teresia did work together will be there if it ever gets in front of a real Judge. The proof is she called Rebecca’s Attorney 4 times crying if she did not sign the affidavit she‘s get sued since Rebecca’s Attorney represents her they told her they could not tell her what to sign or what not to sign but it was illegal for her to be threatened like that they also lied and told her the DA was involved there was no DA. Only July 15, 2003 Rebecca was served with a Civil Suit and they put a Writ of 25K Attachment on Rebecca’s house that she was trying to sell. All her family had left to do was to move. Now it has become hard for her and she cannot work nor can she collect unemployment or get any aid her husband makes too much at a mere 26K a year. It is very hard to sell with a writ it clouds the title. The first Criminal Harassment took place on July 17, 2003 in front of the Clerk Magistrate Paul Malloy. Rebecca did not have an attorney because the first one she had was threatened and would not take the case on contingency and cannot afford one. She was alone they have an Attorney named Anthony Salerno who is an X state Cop that makes his living off telling big people like Larry pay me X amount of dollars and I will make it go away. Rebecca got a new lawyer who finally did an answer to their civil suit and counterclaim. They withheld her wages; they do not care about the money they just want to watch her loose her house. It is sick. She rescues animals they called all the rescues and tried to get her animals taken away from her. She has called many people and they will not help they are afraid. They know who they are they have done this before most people go insane or just cave. Rebecca will not but she does not realize she cannot do this by herself. Right now she has been waiting to get a hearing about the writ they need to prove their claim they got a continuance and Judge Peter Veelis is taking it with him to Springfield, MA then it will be heard in Worcester, MA it is in Limbo and LaChance is the one asking for the continuance and stalling. The Courts are fighting over Jurisdiction and no date has been set it was originally set for August 26, 2003 but Teresia LaFleuer was not available that day. They are seriously suing her for the bonus she would not sign for against the other employee, her salary, not going on a trip with the Boss who was harassing her entire hotel costs, meals, conference, and their auditors for having to come back because they had to check their payroll. Rebecca needed to find out if she did anything illegal and how many people were exactly on the payroll. BDO Siedman is their Auditing and Tax Company and the partner Paul Ford did not know they have only been their Auditors for many years. It raised suspicion. Larry is also suing her for Attorney fees for filing a Criminal harassment complaint at the current time Larry LaChance is asking for 36K and they are finding more to add to it and asking the Judge for triple that amount. Rebecca does not even have it and never will now so what s the point? Still even if she looses her house and everything else they will to still go after her for the money that they do not need. Mr. LaChance is obsessed nobody has ever heard of this. Rebecca never signed checks, did the billing but once and was supervised in fact this guy does not trust anyone he sends them out himself, did not make bank deposits she was there only 6 weeks and she left after the second time she was assaulted. She is not being charged with a crime this Larry LaChance thought he was her husband people do this in divorces no one has ever heard of an employer doing this. Everyone is afraid of these people or just do not care or want a ton of money. Her own Lawyer says they will not settle because it does not help either one if it gets settled they want to litigate it for years. Rebecca has offered to walk away 3 times they will not stop they keep going after her. Rebecca is strong but not that strong no one really is. She is not insane and she has not committed a crime and does not plan too. This is a true story the civil Suit is LaChance Financial vs. Rebecca K. Heitmann in Worcester County Court. During the Criminal Harassment hearing in front of a Judge she was suppose to go in front of one Judge (We will not name because he was not happy about the switch) but it was not set and their Attorney Mr. Anthony Salerno moved Judges blatantly she went in Front of Judge Gardner who cleared the whole court including DA and Bailiff and told her he had a relationship with their Attorney used to share office space his partner X college roommate. Now if you are afraid of people wouldn’t you just about wet yourself being alone in there by yourself no Attorney just the Judge, Your Husband, their Lawyer, and the two people harassing her? Rebecca asked to get in front of another Judge quickly she feared for her life the Judge said no and continued it until September 18, 2003. Her own Lawyer is now afraid of these people because of all their money and friends. She cannot get in front of a real Judge she has not been heard. She is going to loose everything and no one cares. She is not perfect but why the hell would she go on a business trip with a guy who wants to have sex with her and grabbed her by the neck twice? She did call the police they are their friends. She called the DA the AG no one want to touch this. This is messed up. Mr. LaChance is doing this because he was rejected by Rebecca Heitmann he could not force her to have sex with him. She is only 5’2 and not a very big girl but she has a will. All of this can be proven by phone records and witnesses just cannot get in front of a Judge. The whole suit against her is not even really legal and what they are doing is terrorizing her and her family and friends. If you want to support her please call and protest to all thee people that can or should do something below. If you have any donations send to the address above. This is serious there is more but I will not defame people or have anyone who has helped in this be named. She has offered to walk away from the whole thing 3 times and they still are after her. Both Larry LaChance and David Rabinovitz hate woman and hate anyone that rejects them or think is Gay, Black, Chinese, any race or religion but their own. This needs to get out because we cannot have people do this it is madness and they have to be stopped. If you find out Rebecca Heitmann is missing or dead you will know why. This is serious and going public is a dangerous stepping but really what more does she have to loose? The whole thing stinks MA Courts are corrupted and they do not even bother to hide it. We the People of this Country have to do this or else we will always have to wonder. Any support will be turned around eventually. Rebecca’s new line of work if she lives will be to do rescue and be an advocate for people that have gone through this before. Thanks. Just for the Record all Rebecca’s friends and Family do know have depleted their efforts to help but no to stop supporting her. All of this is documented times, dates, phone records, letter from AG, etc… She is not the only one that has this information a lot of people she can really trust do. Again if you want to help please send to the above address she has only two or three weeks then nothing. This is truly injustice a violation of her and her Husband’s civil rights and they will defame her but really again what could be worse????????????? Rebecca knows that there will be a big backlash by going public but remaining silent is much worse. For safety purposes her phone number must remain unlisted. Please call any organizations that can be of help and the list below and send donations. There is one number you can call to leave messages for her and support 508-330-8370 she will try to return some calls but it will go into voicemail. We will not name her Attorney right now he bills her for every call and she cannot afford it. Below are the numbers of the people if you get loud enough that can help. Also there is some corruption do not be afraid to speak out. There are many aspects going on she is too close to something. Again fear is what let’s people get away with this. Thanks.

LaChance Financial dba Bankers Capital 5 Mount Royal Avenue Marlborough, MA 01752 508-229-0660 (Larry LaChance Business) Marlborough District Court 45 Williams Street Marlborough, MA 01752 (508) 485-3700 Worcester Superior Court 2 Main Street Worcester, MA 01608 (508) 770-1899 Salerno, Anthony - Scannell & Salerno LaChance Financial Criminal Attorney Anthony Salerno 316 Main St # 4, Worcester, MA 01608 Phone: (508) 795-1200 Seder & Chandler (LaChance Financials Civil Attorney they are in the same building???) Jeffrey Greenberg 339 Main St # 300, Worcester, MA 01608 Phone: (508) 757-7721 District Attorney Martha Coakley Middlesex District Attorney's Office 40 Thorndike Street Cambridge, MA 02141 (617) 591-7742 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of District Attorney John J. Conte District Attorney's Office Courthouse Room 220, 2 Main Street Worcester, MA 01608 Worcester County 508-755-8601 William Francis Galvin Secretary of the Commonwealth State House, Room 337 Boston, MA 02133(617) 727-7030 Senator Kennedy 315 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 202-224-4543 Senator John Kerry One Bowdoin Square Boston Tenth Floor Boston, MA 02114 (617) 565-8519 – Phone OR 90 Madison Place Worcester Suite 205 Worcester, MA 01608 (508) 831-7380 – Phone Office of the Governor Mitt Romney Room 360 Boston, MA 02133 Phone: (617) 725-4005 Honorable Richard E. Neal House of Representative for State of Massachusetts Washington, D.C. 202-224-3121 Attorney General Tom Reilly One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108-1698 Tel: (617) 727-2200 Honorable Ralph D. Gants Worcester Superior Court 2 Main Street Worcester, MA 01608 (508) 770-1899 Honorable Robert W. Gardner, Jr. Marlborough District Court 45 Williams Street Marlborough, MA 01752 (508) 485-3700 Honorable Peter A. Velis Currently in Springfield, MA (413) 748-8600 413) 748-8646 Commission on Judicial Conduct 14 Beacon Street Suite 102 Boston, MA 02108-3704 Phone: (617) 725-8050 Fax: (617) 248-9938 Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108-1698 617-994-6000

Further update went to Criminal Harrasement alone no Lawyer because no one will go up against Salerno written decision in a few days. Since Larry and David asked for a continuance on the writ she will loose her house on October 6, 2003 no offers her parents cannot even co-sign a loan. These people do not care about the money out to destroy she is not even being charged with a crime bad case everyone know it. Need help Fast!!!!!!!!! By the way no Docket on the Criminal Harrasement what is that mattter of public record!

T2:

Texas

T3:

Williamson

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

Pct.#3

T1:

Jimmy Bitz

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

Year of Case:

1997

T5:

T6:

4

T7:

thebam@juno.com

Date:

September 18, 2003

Brief Comments

Everytime I tried to object the Judge would overrule. Finally he theatened to lock me up, so I shut up! Prosecution in closing out and out lied. Upon appeal I believe it was Judge Mears county court at law #2 Williamson county, Texas in his Charge of the Court changed the prima facie speed limit to 55 mph. The citation plainly stated the speed limit to be 65 mph.

T2:

texas

T3:

harris

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

257

T1:

Motherall

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

2000

T5:

2-2000

T6:

?

T7:

Date:

August 31, 2003

Brief Comments

My husband has been tied up in court for the last 2 years. Judge Motherall is for women rights. She is not fair to men.

T2:

texas

T3:

harris

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

T4:

257

T1:

Motherall

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

2000

T5:

2-2000

T6:

?

T7:

Date:

August 31, 2003

Brief Comments

My husband has been tied up in court for the last 2 years. Judge Motherall is for women rights. She is not fair to men.

T2:

Virginia

T3:

Norfolk

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

01

T1:

Judge Junius P. Fulton

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

1999

T5:

T6:

08

T7:

wwhhayesservices@aol.com

Date:

August 22, 2003

Brief Comments

The case that my brothers and I were involved in concerned our late father, who passed away April 2002.A sister who was having financial difficulties filed for legal guardianship of our father who was diagnosed with a slight case of alzheimers. She was represented by my former attorney's associate. The judge in the matter was also my former attorney. The attorneys had both worked from the same firm at one time. The firm was Robinson, Madison,Fulton & Anderson. Before that it was Robinson, Zaleski, Lindsey & Associates. Lindsey also represented me when he was with the firm. Lindsey is currently a parttime judge here in the city of Norfolk. It was Lindsey associate and or partner Doris Edmonds that represented my sister. Lindsey and Edmonds work from the same law office, which is called The Law Office of Joseph Lindsey. Edmonds is the wife of a former Norfolk Circuit Court Judge. These judges and attorneys mention are politically connected and very close friends. Thank you for allowing me to informed you of the corruption that goes on in the courts here in Norfolk, Virginia.

T2:

minnesota

T3:

polk

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

T4:

K3 96 891

T1:

judge michael kraker

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

Year of Case:

1996

T5:

5

T6:

T7:

petesfarmftg@yahoo.com

Date:

August 13, 2003

Brief Comments

Judge kraker held a trial w/o no finding of probable cause, no omnibus hearing, tampered loaded jury, denied my right to testify on direct to a matter of public record, warrantless searches, search warrants issued after the fact, had the trial transcripts edited, added to, falsified. added a 2nd charge after the jury was sworn-added on the 1st day of the alleged trial, allowed knowing use of perjury, refused to control the prosecutor from making unsworn comments during my direct, allowed false evidence, allowed a false alleged crime scene, conspired with the prosecutor, & publi defender to ensure a false conviction, denied my right to allocution, allowed expired unrelated priors to enflame the tampered jury-INTER ALIA, this is just off the top of my head

T2:

Philadelphia

T3:

The case was in a::

Federal Appeals Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

3rd Circuit

T1:

Marcia Waldron, clerk

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

Year of Case:

2001

T5:

3

T6:

T7:

Nj0216@aol.com

Date:

August 09, 2003

Brief Comments

Marcia Waldron is acting as circuit judge in the Third Circuit. She made several erroneous and contrary rulings, mostly unsigned per curiam ones. She has acted very unprofessional with me, and make it clear she does not like pro se litigators. She allowed attorneys and others to committ crimes. She made several statements in opinions that she knew were false. She ignored continuous violation of Title VII, ADA and other anti discrimination retaliation clauses, and supported the victimization of me (N'Jai) during so-called protected activities. She knew of a lie the attorneys told regarding the jury verdict of this case, where they voted 6 no answer and 5 no of 11, and that the judge and attorneys dismissed the 6 to make it appear they won and to cover up mistrial. The attorney spoke to the juror, and called a witness that was a friend of the juror. Filed fabricated information. Convered up a suspected drug dealer activites in a public school. Marcia supressed impeaching or exculpatory evidence against the Appellees (state and attorneys). She refused any oral arguments, or any communications with any judge. She lied and claimed claims were frivilous, after judges determinied they were not and granted the trial transcripts to me on the basis that the claims were not frivilous and rasie substantial question. She lied that my case(s) were meritless when the merits of my cases were never dealth with, only technical FRCivP 12(b)(6) nonesense. She knows of D. Sisk another clerk that changed a plenary review reversal in my favor, after 1 year, without any appeal from opposing parties. He made up a false order in opposition to the order, judgment, and madate of 4/30/98 by Cohen, Rendell, and Stapelton. It cause me to lose 190,000 case, that was over. He altered documents the way they are submitted by Applellants. They claim papers are not in order, when they are in order. They make extremely heightened pleading requirements for pro se people and liberally construe atttorneys. I filed nurmerous complaints against her in the 3rd Circuit and US Supreme Court. I ased her to recluse herself or involuntarily. But each time I say anything, she dismiss another of my cases by fraud, lies, and misconduct, under the color of retaliation or the law. I want her stopped. She is also working with a Willima Suter in the US Supreme Court. He blocks all appeasls I made. He changed several into mandamus' and then dismissed and refused any appeal no matter what they are about, or how relevant they are. He sent information or appeals I sent directly to Justices back 4 times. He tells me what I can and cannot file. He tells me to file mandamus' and refuses anything. He and Waldron are abusing their court position and acting under the color of the law. I have strict proof. I do not have a right to a judge. I have no rights whatsoever according to Waldron, Sisk and Sutter. They are acting as attorney, jusdge, and jury. See N'Jai vs. Pittsburgh Board of Public Education, N'Jai Vs EEOC, etc.

T2:

Kentucky

T3:

McLean

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

T4:

T1:

David Jernigan, Calhoun KY

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

Year of Case:

2001

T5:

2001

T6:

2001

T7:

Wanda9003@Juno.com

Date:

August 01, 2003

Brief Comments

The Judge, David Jernigan, would not allow any evidence to be presented in the court that proved the other party to be telling lies. I had to represent myself because the court would not allow me to have an attorney appointed because they said in a custody battle I had to hire my own. Social Service workers were involved and it involved where My daughter abandoned her daughter at 2 months old adn then years later when her daughter was 6 1/2 yrs old she decides she wants her back so she will be able to support herself with the checks her daughter wil get from the state! Social service gave me temporary then permanent custody to begin with. The judge informed me that according to the re-unification laws that the state had to give custody back to the parents who requested custody back. Also when the opposing attorney filed for modification of custody she did not include any affidavits....which she was required to...at this point the judge should have dismissed the motion but did not and told her to correct her mistake. The attorney them filed the affidavits BUT filed it as attached to the first motion made.This time she was not asking the court for anything..just filed the affidavits. At any rate the judge accepted that. and we went onward with everyting.

T2:

California

T3:

Los Angeles

The case was in a::

District Civil Court

I rate this Judge as follows::

V10

T4:

9th Circuit Court of Appeal

T1:

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

Year of Case:

1996

T5:

6

T6:

T7:

rchrdstrck@aol.com

Date:

July 28, 2003

Brief Comments

My compliant for civil damages based on violations of the 1996 Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TBOR) was dismissed three times by the district court in Los Angeles, based on 1995 precedent.

The judge who dismissed me three times is District Judge Robert M. Takasugi, in Case No. CV96-6164-RMT. The last time he dismissed me was December 27, 2000.

As a low income senior citizen I refinanced my home to pay an attorney S20,000 to help me with my Ninth Circuit Court appeal, as case No. 01-55257, and it was dismissed twice.

My complaint was after the IRS conducted an legally unjustified audit and mistakenly said I earned $60,000 in unreported income.

The mistake put the welfare of our children at risk because it put me in violation of grant applications that said if they learn I earned more than claimed to get the grant then none of our children could graudate from a CA university.

It took the IRS four years and a federal complaint (CV96-6164-RMT) before they recanted on the claim I earned the $60,000.

Both of our two daughters have now graduated CA universities but I still haven't been able to collect damages from the IRS for causing me to lose my business.

The IRS agent who did the legally unjustifed audit, and made the $60,000 mistake, that caused me to lose my business has never missed a payday. What the IRS did is the moral equivilent of throwing a person's life away (mine).

Richard Strickland

Court No. :

7

T1:

Pam Derbyshire

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

I was in the Court as::

Juror

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

Year of Case:

2003

Date:

June 30, 2003

Brief Comments

This was my second time as a juror in Judge Derbyshire's court.

Her effort to speak to the jury after the verdict adds a good touch to the jury duty obligation.

She obviously manages a busy load of cases, and she keeps a lot of things moving. I was impressed with her control of the trial. She allowed the defense attorney to make his point while at the same time having to regularly keep him from violating trial protocol and rules.

RMTrembly

Court No. :

T1:

cummings

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

Year of Case:

Date:

June 30, 2003

Brief Comments

Court No. :

2

T1:

Clif Stricklin

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

Year of Case:

2003

Date:

June 25, 2003

Brief Comments

Court No. :

T1:

Anthony   Young

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

Year of Case:

1995

Date:

June 05, 2003

Brief Comments

Court No. :

311

T1:

Doug Warne

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

Year of Case:

1995

Date:

April 28, 2003

Brief Comments

Very fair but seems like he could be a little firmer.

Court No. :

1

T1:

austin

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

Year of Case:

2002

Date:

April 09, 2003

Brief Comments

Court No. :

804

T1:

means

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

The case was in a::

District Criminal Court

Year of Case:

Date:

March 21, 2003

Brief Comments

Court No. :

T1:

Suzie Merkley

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

Year of Case:

2003

Date:

March 19, 2003

Brief Comments

I'm a contractor and sued a customer for $5K. He didn't appear in court but the judge heard from his kinfolks and ignored my plea to rule in my favor. The customer defaulted by not being in court but the judge overruled law and took matters in her own hands. She denied my claim.

Court No. :

0

T1:

Andrew Mackey

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

The case was in a::

State Supreme Court

Year of Case:

1845

Date:

March 05, 2003

Brief Comments

the judge is a &($!

Court No. :

232

T1:

MARY LOU KEEL

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

Year of Case:

99

Date:

February 16, 2003

Brief Comments

Court No. :

T1:

Paul F. Lutty, Jr.

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

Year of Case:

1995

Date:

February 08, 2003

Brief Comments

In Pittsburgh Pennsylvania, Allegheny County Common Please, we have more crooked eclected judges than honest ones. The first judge, Joseph Jaffe, took a bribe to fix my case, and refused to recuse because he received a paycheck from the Defendants, and only when I began to expose his role in an embezzlement scheme did he suddently recuse. He had signed the defendants' proposed order before the hearing dismissing my suit, and had to vacate it, because the proposed order was stapled in side the Defense pleadings and he couldn't rip it up to hide proof of his lack of due process. The arrogant judge apologized in front of 100 attorneys to the Defense attorney for recusing, and said, don't worry, I'll get you another judge, which he did, and that is the crooked judge I'm ranking here, Paul F. Lutty. His father was a union shop steward who got elected to the state legislature, and Lutty was his only child. He grew up watching his father satisfy his constituency, and so this is the baggage he brings as an elected offficial to Judge. He never read anything I wrote, be- he had Jaffe and Jaffe's colleague, the influential attorney defendant. handling my suit. Some due process, huh? They also fixed it in the Sup= erior Court, Justices DelSole who allegedly recused, Tamilia and Bender. My case had the proof of my complaint's allegations filed in the case, yet all these crooks granted summary judgment to Defendants in order to deny me a jury trial.. The FBI caught Jaffe soliciting bribes and indicted him, but the Pennsylvania Supreme Court refused to allow me to appeal it, and the prothonotary refused to file my timely received motion for re- consideration.on the basis of two case-fixing judges affirmed by the appellate court, saying i did not put in the certification required of attorneys. I sent in an application for Extraordinary Relief, but I'm sure that won't get filed later. 15 years of litigation the defendants couldn't beat on the merits, so the judges just fixed the case for their buddies.

Court No. :

309

T1:

Judge Hay

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

Year of Case:

2001

Date:

February 02, 2003

Brief Comments

In an emergency restraining order and custody hearing evidence and witness were presented that the mother of a 3 year old child was unfit, drug user, allowed older child to have sex in house with her present, provided 16 yr old with alcohol and with drugs. The girl got mad at her boyfriend broke into a locked gun case, loaded a weapon after getting shells out of a closet and fired the gun off several times in the house. The father of the 3 yr old was at work while these type of things were going on, and discovered the evidence after the fact in the 16 yr old girls diary. The mother had no witnesses except for herself, and she testified she was a good Mom, and had never done drugs in her life. With no furher investigation, or drug test ordered, Judge Hay ordered the father to turn the 3 yr old over to her mother within a 2 hour period. The father got a drug test including of the hair, within a day or so of that order that showed him as clean. He has never done drugs. It took 6 or more long weeks to eventually get drug test of the mother, including several court orders that were ignored, and she was not held in contempt even by Judge Guzman. Eventually the test was provided by the mother proved positive on the mother.The father did get custody of the child. However, this additional trauma to the child, and father should never have happened if the Judge had been more concerned for the safety of this child and ordered test on all concerned initially, while being sure the child was being properly taken care of. (I ( a responsible grandmother) was taking care of her at my son's home during that period of time) Apparently Judge Hay was biased that a child should be with their mother no matter what. He endanged this child by not even ordering drug testing before making a decision or any concern for the baby's safety. There needs to be more 'contempt charges' for not following court orders, and perjury should be prosecuted. It should be automatic that parents be tested for drugs in this day and time when there is a question of drugs being involved..with results in hand prior to decisions of custody of a child.

Court No. :

T1:

Kevin Copper

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

Year of Case:

00

Date:

January 04, 2003

Brief Comments

This is one of the most fairest Judges I have even met. he follows the book. Reads the law. Does not bend to attorneys follishness against pro se ppl. I thing he is a God sent. he is a magistract district justice in Pittsburgh.

Court No. :

T1:

William Standish

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

The case was in a::

Federal District Court

Year of Case:

01

Date:

December 31, 2002

Brief Comments

This judge fixed a case right before my eyes. The jury verdict was of 11 only five no against me, but the other 6 were not. He used Rule 50 motions to dismiss the other 6 and claimed victory for the defendant thugs. He also in another case, denied the Defendants F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismissed on the grounds that I have many prima facie claims. Then even dismissed their limines (or) summary judgments #1. But as soon as I filed an appeal against him and his first trial errors, he immediately thereafter dismissed those prima facies claims without cause, but in retaliation. Fiannly, he has cases identical to mines ( Section 1983-) that he treated totally differently than mines. Contradictory ruling for the same thing cause I am pro se and the other is litiganted by a white attorney.

Court No. :

T1:

William Standish

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

The case was in a::

Federal District Court

Year of Case:

01

Date:

December 31, 2002

Brief Comments

This judge fixed a case right before my eyes. The jury verdict was of 11 only five no against me, but the other 6 were not. He used Rule 50 motions to dismiss the other 6 and claimed victory for the defendant thugs. He also in another case, denied the Defendants F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismissed on the grounds that I have many prima facie claims. Then even dismissed their limines (or) summary judgments #1. But as soon as I filed an appeal against him and his first trial errors, he immediately thereafter dismissed those prima facies claims without cause, but in retaliation.

Court No. :

T1:

William Standish

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

The case was in a::

Federal District Court

Year of Case:

98

Date:

December 31, 2002

Brief Comments

This judge fixed a case right before my eyes. The jury verdict was of 11 only five no against me, but the other 6 were not. He used Rule 50 motions to dismiss the other 6 and claimed victory for the defendant thugs. He also in another case, denied the Defendants F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismissed on the grounds that I have many prima facie claims. Then even dismissed their limines (or) summary judgments #1. But as soon as I filed an appeal against him and his first trial errors, he immediately thereafter dismissed those prima facies claims without cause, but in retaliation.

Court No. :

T1:

Gustave Diamond

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

The case was in a::

Federal District Court

Year of Case:

98

Date:

December 31, 2002

Brief Comments

This Judge allowed attorneys for the defendants in m case to dismissed all the black jurors, kept dismissing my case even when the Third Circuit Court reversed it by plenary review for his errors. He openly was racist and bias due to race and pro se. He acted a prosecutor for the Defendants. He knows that the clerk filed false dockets that did not reflect what the higher court ruled. He sucks big time.

Court No. :

T1:

Joseph Jaffe

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

Year of Case:

02

Date:

December 31, 2002

Brief Comments

This judge fixed cases through bribery and got busted by the FBI with 13,000 in his pocket as he left the attorneys home after being paid. I also had him undo monetary judgments, by calling me into his chambers and telling me to accept less money than what my judgments were for. He is debencched, but still receiving salary. See Pittsburgh Post-Gazette type in his last name in the search area. He and McFalls are in the same Court of Common Pleas that is filled with criminal like racketeering thugs.

Court No. :

T1:

H. Patrick McFalls

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

Year of Case:

02

Date:

December 31, 2002

Brief Comments

This Judge was debenched for being drunk on the bench, making illegal decisions that ruined many lives. He is still collecting his 100,000.00 + salary. He fired his staff for exposing his corruption.

Court No. :

T1:

H. Patrick McFalls

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

Year of Case:

01

Date:

December 31, 2002

Brief Comments

This Judge was debenched for being drunk on the bench, making illegal decisions that ruined many lives. He is still collecting his 100,000.00 + salary. He fired his staff for exposing his corruption.

Court No. :

T1:

Kim Berkley Clark

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

Year of Case:

01

Date:

December 31, 2002

Brief Comments

I watched this Judge supress evidence to convict a 12 year old for a crime the alleged victim said he did not do, withut any evidence. She refused to allow the parent to buy and trial transcriptsw cause the ppl including the police and the person impeached her ruling. She used the boy to harass his grandmother who is a pro se litigant against court corruption. She should be debenched.

Court No. :

T1:

Livingston Johnson

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

Year of Case:

00

Date:

December 31, 2002

Brief Comments

This Judge refused to recuse himself, and helped what his 15 year long lawyer friend get her client out of a default judgment. I accidently put equitable before. I did not know how to use the form.

Court No. :

T1:

Livingston Johnson

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

Year of Case:

Date:

December 31, 2002

Brief Comments

Court No. :

310

T1:

Lisa Millard

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

Year of Case:

2002

Date:

November 08, 2002

Brief Comments

Judge Millard gives extreme latitude to attorney's who "donate" to her campaign.

Court No. :

257

T1:

Linda Motheral

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

Year of Case:

2002

Date:

November 03, 2002

Brief Comments

I was denied standard visitation after I was originally awarded such. More to my opinion of why I rate Ms. Motheral the way I did was because of a ruling concerning alimony. The law does not define stipulations for temporary spousal maintenance, so I feel that because of this spousal maintenance should never be awarded short of what the law interprets. Nevertheless, I was ordered to pay when my situation was not what the law defined for such.

Court No. :

11

T1:

Timberlake

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

Year of Case:

02

Date:

November 02, 2002

Brief Comments

Court No. :

COA

T1:

LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and WALKER, JJ.

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

The case was in a::

State Appellant Court

Year of Case:

2001

Date:

October 27, 2002

Brief Comments

See if you can follow the logic of this COA opinion on expunction. The statute requires that the person petitioning for expunction have not been charged with a felony in the five years preceeding their petition. Texas DPS, which has access to all arrest records in the nation, as well as the State, demands the Petitioner prove they have not had a felony arrest in the preceeding five years. The Petitioner provides a verified petition. The District Court accepted this. The COA says it's not sufficient evidence to prove it to Texas DPS!!!!!

What's wrong with this picture? Are these appellate court judges that stupid or that arrogantly biased? They even had the opinion published!

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-00-333-CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

V.

MARK ALAN HERRON APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

To read the opinion go to Texas Judiciary Online www.courts.state.tx.us

Court No. :

245

T1:

Annette Galik

I rate this Judge as follows::

3  NOT fair or equitable, Displayed BIAS

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

Year of Case:

Date:

October 26, 2002

Brief Comments

Annette Galik continue to lenghten the case, thus putting extra economic burden to both plantiff and defendent. She continue to show bias toward women.

Court No. :

c2

T1:

Michael Peters

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

Year of Case:

2001

Date:

October 25, 2002

Brief Comments

Court No. :

2

T1:

Michael A. Peters

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

Year of Case:

99

Date:

October 23, 2002

Brief Comments

Court No. :

2

T1:

Michael Allen Peters

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

Year of Case:

2002

Date:

October 22, 2002

Brief Comments

Court No. :

2

T1:

michael peters

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

Year of Case:

02

Date:

October 22, 2002

Brief Comments

this judge is very competent; has a "solomon" wisdom; always takes time with defendants who appear in court especially with young persons who are there for first time; where abuse is to a significant other always tries to include the victim in plea-esp where they are trying to maintain their relationship; tries to ensure restitution is paid everytime to victims.

Court No. :

ONE

T1:

Russell Austin

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

Year of Case:

1995

Date:

October 19, 2002

Brief Comments

This is a Statutory Probate Court in Harris County === tenchincally, it is not a Texas constitutional court! The "STATUTORY" Probate Courts were created by ruse of the legislature, i.e. constitutional amendment process. Anyone and Everyone who owns real property is subject to this bastard court AFTER DEATH and BEFORE DEATH under GUARDIANSHIP. Only 18 counties in Texas have statutory probate courts. All others are handled by county court. PLEASE add these courts to your selection of courts.

Barbara Youngs Settle

Court No. :

113

T1:

Patricia Hancock

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

The case was in a::

District Civil Court

Year of Case:

1998

Date:

October 17, 2002

Brief Comments

This judge is the "in house" judge of the Parker, Leahy law firm, and was suborned in bribery by lawyer Grant Cook, Her law partner, to engage in an illegal, and prohibited Ex Parte hearing, to assist Grant Cook in theft of an entire company.

She signed fraudulent Orders, leading to criminal prosecution of an innocent victim, for benefit of her law partner,lawyer Grant Cook, and his client Charles N. (Buzzy) Schwarz, Jr.

Several Criminal allegations have been made against her, but the d.A. refuses to prosecute the felonies, as he is her republican conspirator, that framed the innocent victim, and prosecuted with perjured testimony of lawyer Grant Cook.

This woman is totally incompetent to be a judge, and has obvious criminal inclinations, when her lawyer friends are in her court..

Court No. :

113

T1:

Patricia Hancock

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

I was in the Court as::

Defendant

The case was in a::

District Civil Court

Year of Case:

1998

Date:

October 16, 2002

Brief Comments

AFFIDAVIT OF CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY Concerning State District Judge Patricia Hancock Of the 113th District Court of Harris County, Texas

COUNTY OF HARRIS § § STATE OF TEXAS §

My name is HARRY L. BOWLES, I am a resident of Houston, Harris County, Texas, am over 21 years of age, of sound mind, and fully qualified and competent, to make this affidavit of truth.

I make this Affidavit of truth upon my personal knowledge of all facts and allegations contained herein, and under pain and penalty of Perjury. All statements herein are made in good faith to the best of my knowledge, and understanding of the U.S. and Texas Constitutions, and laws of this State.

The following are undisputed legal facts:

1) Judge Patricia Hancock took an oath of office “To uphold and defend the laws and Constitution of Texas.” 2) Knowing violation of a sacred oath to “defend the Constitution” is legally labeled as TREASON. A Judge that engages in the act of Treason, commits a criminal act against the State, and Sovereign citizens of Texas.

I, Harry L. Bowles, do hereby make the formal charges of:

Treason, Criminal Fraud, Criminal Conspiracy, Aggravated Perjury, Conspiracy to Fraud, and Subornation of Bribery, against Judge Patricia Hancock in a case titled No.98-16726. Patricia Hancock (Hancock) has violated her Constitutional oath many times, in the course of her personal involvement in cause 91-025939, an ongoing case, she is not, nor has ever been assigned to.

Background:

The State Legislature passed a law simply referred to as “The Republic of Texas (ROT) Lien Law.” The law was passed May, 1997 for the specific purpose of protecting government officials against common law liens placed upon them by that rogue separatist group. The law was unconstitutional on its face when passed, and has been many times since, declared as unconstitutional on its face.

The law was intended for the above specific purpose, and not intended to be used in commercial contract law. I, Harry L. Bowles (Bowles) am owner of a consensual commercial contract lien, derived from cause No. 91-025939, against Defendant Charles Norman Schwarz, Jr. (Schwarz). The lien was based in the Uniform Commercial Code, from an agreed contract Settlement Agreement of October, 1993, between Bowles and Schwarz. Schwarz owed Bowles a considerable sum, but did not want to pay the agreed amount of the Settlement. Schwarz had a lawyer, Damon Grant Cook (Cook), of Houston, who was a law partner with Judge Patricia Hancock, both as Associates of the Parker, Leahy law firm of Houston.

Hancock was running for election to the 113th District Court in 1997, and was assisted in that effort by Cook, and other members of the Parker, Leahy firm. After Hancock was elected to the Bench of the113th court, the illegal ROT Legislation was in force. Cook went to Hancock, his law partner, now a new judge, and “suborned” her into holding a covert, and prohibited ExParte Hearing, as provided for in the ROT lien law. The unconstitutional ROT lien law, actually directs a judge to violate her oath of office. The Judge does NOT have to violate her oath of office, as she can simply refuse to engage in violating the Texas and Federal Constitutions. The Judges oath to “Defend the Constitutions” is above any illegal law, and is a fiduciary oath that may not be violated under any circumstances.

As follows are Bowles documented and undisputed criminal violations against Judge Patricia Hancock:

First undisputed criminal fact documentation -

The Texas Constitution at Article 5, Section 1a. (6)A, mandates that Judges must comply with the “Code of Judicial Conduct.” The Code of Judicial Conduct prohibits Judges from holding ExParte hearings. Judge Hancock, signed a document, attesting under her own hand, that she held a Constitutionally prohibited ExParte hearing on or about April 9, 1998. Hancock signed what she termed as “Findings of Fact” in a case titled No. 98-16726, a secret case dealing with Bowles Lien against Schwarz, that Bowles the owner of the lien, had no knowledge of whatsoever. This action of issuing an illegal order from an illegal, prohibited hearing, is codified under the Texas Penal Code as: §15.02 Criminal Conspiracy (a)(1)(2)(b)(c)(1) (State jail felony) §32.46 Securing Execution of a Document by Deception (a)(b)(7) (First degree felony) §36.02 Bribery (a)(2)(3)(c) (Second degree felony) §36.04 Improper Influence (a)(b) (Class A Misdemeanor) §39.02 Abuse of Official Capacity (a)(1)(b) (Class A Misdemeanor) §39.03 Official Oppression (a)(1)(b) (Class A Misdemeanor) .

Second undisputed criminal fact documentation –

The Texas Constitution at Article 3, Section 56, prohibits the State Legislature from passing any “special or local law”, IMPAIRING LIENS. Despite this prohibition, the Legislature enacted a knowingly violative law against the sacred Texas Constitution. Judge Hancock took an oath to defend the Constitution, against such illegal legislative acts. Under the Separation of Powers doctrine, the only entities that a judge defends the Constitution against, are the Legislative Branch (State Legislature), when they try to pass illegal laws, and the Executive Branch (Governor) when engaging in wrongdoing. So, Hancock, had a fiduciary duty to defend Bowles from a blatantly illegal law. Hancock instead, went to work for her law Partner Cook. When Cook approached Hancock to engage in an illegal hearing, Hancock was duty bound to refuse to conduct a prohibited Ex Parte hearing. Hancock instead, willingly violated her oath, in an effort to help her own law partner. This is constitutes subornation of bribery Of Hancock by Cook, to engage in a Constitutionally prohibited act. Under the Texas Penal Code: §32.33 Hindering Secured Creditors (First degree felony) §36.02 Bribery

Third undisputed criminal fact documentation –

The State furnishes a printed form to be used by the Lien Petitioner to fill out to present to the Judge. One requirement, is that an Affidavit must be submitted, attesting the lien being examined is not consensual. Cook and Schwarz did not fill this required Statement out nor submitted the required Affidavit, which VOIDED their Petition. Despite the Petition being fatally defective, Hancock still knowingly approved same, and issued a knowingly fraudulent “Findings of Fact”. This is an overt criminal act of, and is evidence of subornation of bribery by her law partner, Grant Cook. Under the Texas Penal Code: §36.02 Bribery

Fourth undisputed criminal fact documentation –

Hancock, with use of her signature, creating a knowingly fraudulent document, then conspired with Cook, to attempt to coerce Harry L. Bowles (Bowles) into a forced release of his lien with a VOID document, or if refusing, Bowles would be criminally prosecuted. This is a direct threat of extortion, classified under the Penal Code: §32.46 Securing Execution of a Document by Deception §39.02 Abuse of Official Capacity §39.03 Official Oppression

Fifth undisputed criminal fact documentation –

Using of her signature on a VOID document, Hancock then illegally authorized the criminal prosecution of Bowles. To wrongly prosecute a criminal charge with a knowingly false document constitutes Aggravated Perjury, and is codified as: §37.03 Aggravated Perjury (a)(1)(2) (Third degree felony)

Sixth undisputed criminal fact documentation –

Hancock as a State District Judge is well aware that any lawsuit filed under Texas Rules of Civil Procedure (TRCP), Rule 39, “Joinder of Parties Needed for Just Adjudication”, must join all parties in a case. The Suit Cook Filed regarding the Lien is Case no. 98-16726. In a new lawsuit, all parties with an interest in the suit must be joined. This means all parties must be served with the suit, given proper time to respond, and present their case. No judge may engage in Exparte hearings in a lawsuit, as it is strictly prohibited. No judge under any circumstances may issue any type of order without giving the other side opportunity to be heard. This is strictly forbidden, and is the gravest of forbidden acts by a judge. With full knowledge of the “Joinder” rule, Hancock knowingly violated her oath, by engaging in a forbidden ExParte hearing, issuing a “no notice” court document, and conspiring to coerce one side to sign a forced release of a lien, under threat of criminal prosecution. These acts come under the following penal code violations: §15.02 Criminal Conspiracy §32.33 Hindering Secured Creditors §36.04 Improper Influence §39.02 Abuse of Official Capacity §39.03 Official Oppression

I, Harry L. Bowles attest that the above six (6) itemized criminal acts are accurate and legally correct statements under the Texas Constitution, TRCP, and Texas and Federal controlling case law, to the best of my personal knowledge.

FURTHER AFFIANT SAITH NAUGHT.

______________________________ AFFIANT, Harry L. Bowles

On this 8th day of October, 2002, appeared before me, the person known to me as Harry L. Bowles, and attested to the foregoing statements as true and correct to the best of his knowledge.

My Commission expires:

______________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the STATE OF TEXAS

Court No. :

248

T1:

Campbell

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

I was in the Court as::

I prefer to not disclose

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

Year of Case:

2001

Date:

October 10, 2002

Brief Comments

Judge Campbell is one of the fairest judges I have ever encountered.

She was the only Judge I encountered and due to her professionalism and caring I have learned to recover and be set free from my dependency problem.

She was fair and made assistance for my problem easy to get to as long as I abide by the rules.

No problem there.

I have observed her from the bench and I personally think that she us just right on!

Court No. :

10

T1:

Marianne E Becker

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

I was in the Court as::

Pro Se

The case was in a::

County Criminal Court

Year of Case:

1993

Date:

October 07, 2002

Brief Comments

This judge went on the record before trial as stating that I was guilty and refused to recuse herself when confronted with a motion asking for such based upon that record. This judge granted a motion in limine preventing me from presenting to the jury information that would have exonorated me. This judge specifically tailored a set of jury instructions that virtually insured my conviction.

Court No. :

T1:

Stanley Henry

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

I was in the Court as::

Plaintiff

The case was in a::

Federal District Court

Year of Case:

1997

Date:

September 25, 2002

Brief Comments

I appealed his ruling. I was given a "favorable" decision by the Appeals Judge the honorable Barry S. Brown. The Appeals and Hearings Council "told" the Appeals Judge to "give a different decision". This was on a SSA disability claim. I am now in a battle with the SSA to have Judge Brown's decision upheld as the SSA did NOT want me to have this decision. If at all possible is there anywhere I can obtain help? I've been batteling this for 4+ years. I have substantiating documentation. I may be able to give assistance to any who find themselves in this same situation. MY E-MAIL IS cherylduffey@hotmail.com Please contact me concerning this matter. Sincerely Cheryl Duffey

Court No. :

4

T1:

Cynthia Crowe

I rate this Judge as follows::

1  Very Fair / Equitable

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

Year of Case:

2001

Date:

September 19, 2002

Brief Comments

Court No. :

311

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

The case was in a::

Family or Juvenile Court

Year of Case:

2002

Date:

September 05, 2002

Brief Comments

He went against all of the constitution from the word go. This judge should be put out to pasture.

Court No. :

311

I rate this Judge as follows::

5  Made Rulings Contrary to the Constitution

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

The case was in a::

State Supreme Court

Year of Case:

2002

Date:

September 05, 2002

Brief Comments

He went against all of the constitution from the word go. This judge should be put out to pasture.

Court No. :

I rate this Judge as follows::

4  Made Rulings Contrary to the Law

I was in the Court as::

Observer to a Proceeding

The case was in a::

County Civil Court

Year of Case:

2000

Date:

August 14, 2002

Brief Comments

Elizabeth Coker, San Jacinto/Liberty/Trinity County District Judge, Civil and Criminal. During a child custody case the summer of 2000, Judge Coker ordered the Plaintiff, the father trying to save his children from criminal neglect by his ex-wife, to pay IN ADDITION TO HIS CHILD SUPPORT the sum of $250 based on the ex-wife's lie that she & the children were being evicted during the case and $250 would stop it. No Texas Law exists allowing this order to have been made. The judge also ordered the father to take groceries to the ex-wife, no specified dollar value. The ex-wife turned down 3 jobs offered her in that 45 day period, stating that she and the children could live on the child support alone instead. The father won custody only after filling the gallery with political opponents of Judge Coker for the final hearing.

Send mail to info@informed.org with questions / Copyright © 2002 All Rights Reserved by Informed Citizens

Click to subscribe to ed44

DISCLOSURE: every word in this website is our OPINION and not intended as advice.
The UPLC (Unlicensed Practice of Law Committee) of the State Bar of Texas
has claimed authority  to deny you access to the law from anyone other than
their members at whatever price their members choose to charge.
THIS IS AN ISSUE OF AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL CLAIM OF AUTHORITY
However; we voice only opinions which you take as advice at your own peril.